Postings

Saturday 20 September 2014

SOUTH AFRICA - TWENTY YEARS LATER




SOUTH AFRICA

TWENTY YEARS LATER


Stes de Necker


When the people of South Africa met on the 25th and 26th June 1955 in Kliptown near Johannesburg, the Congress of the People was convened and this meeting represented a historical moment in the establishment of a new order in South Africa, based on freedom, democracy and the will of the people. It brought together 2,844 delegates from all over the country. At this meeting, ‘The Freedom Charter’ (for a democratic South Africa), which embodied the hopes and aspirations of the majority of the people of South Africa, was adopted. The Charter proclaimed that ''South Africa belongs to all who live in it" and that "all shall be equal before the law" and It pledged to continue the struggle until a new democratic order was put into place.

The new order became reality when the ANC win the election in 1994 and took over the government of South Africa.

2014 marks the 20th anniversary of the ANC ruled Government and the question can be asked, and rightfully so, ‘What became of the noble aspirations adopted by the people of South Africa in 1995?’

During the past two decades, many foreign visitors who visited South Africa before are currently avoiding coming to South Africa; Several foreign investors who a decade ago was excited to invest in South Africa, are now taking their investments elsewhere; peaceful marches and protests turn violent in the space of minutes and normally lead to bloodshed and mayhem.

In the 20 years since the end of white minority rule, South Africa has rarely looked so unattractive.

Mining and Agriculture are in crisis as costs rise and commodity prices fail to cover the costs of production. Strikes and demonstrations are spreading across the mining industry and into other sectors.

Companies are losing production, and the recognized unions, with which business was able to barter in the past, have lost influence over the labour force.

Equally worrying is the political atmosphere which is not only highly charged but becoming increasingly poisonous. Opportunists such as Julius Malema, the disgraced former youth leader of the African National Congress, is now sitting in Parliament where he is not only busy exploiting the leadership vacuum, but is making a mockery of the proud South African Parliamentary tradition.

Black Economic Empowerment, affirmative action, nationalization and land reform, are still the greatest evils of the ANC culture and are effectively being manipulated by the Malema’s sitting in Parliament to further their own political aspirations and ideals.

South Africa is fast becoming a comedian's paradise. One after the other comic error is denting South Africa’s image locally and abroad.

The Nkandla debacle, the Malema circus, the bumbling Land Audit conducted by the Department of Land Affairs, a prejudiced Justice system and fraud and corruption uncovered almost daily in just about every State Department, are all fuelling the negative sentiments towards South Africa all over the world.

Remarkably, South Africa in terms of income distribution and wealth, has become even more unequal since 1994. What is needed to address this problem is much more than a debate about land tenure.

A culture of self-enrichment of the privileged loyalists in the ANC has taken root in all levels of Government. It is a culture of, ‘get as rich as possible, as soon as possible.’  It is a culture that embraces a variety of ills, most of which are aimed at the erosion of our constitutional democracy and the maintenance of the unscrupulous and incompetent politicians in their panelled offices and luxurious limousines.

The government's controversial tender system provides the opportunity for every friend and family member of the ruling elite to secure lucrative contracts, the vast majority of which are never implemented, or alternatively it is so half executed that the work or service have to redone in any case.  

And for those who do not have nepotistic connections with the ruling elite, there is always the possibility of a lucrative position somewhere in the deployment of some ANC's cadre.
 
Corruption in all facets and levels of Government has certainly the best income to risk ratio anywhere in the world, as less than 5% of all corruption charges are successfully prosecuted in our courts.

The immediate conundrum is not an easy one. Miners are already South Africa’s best-paid workers, but by comparison with the ruling black elite they are paupers. It may be possible for the government and industry to win some breathing space again by buying them, and workers in other industries, off. But this will only be a short term solution (and a small part at that) of the real problem. Further wage increases seems inevitable which will only mean that the mining industry will be become smaller and less competitive as a result.

Radical reforms to education, the labour market, business regulation and land ownership are needed to spur labour intensive sectors such as mining, manufacturing and agriculture.

Violence and the daily dose of comic errors by the political leadership are however symbolic of a bigger and deeper malaise. South Africa's problems are bigger than most South Africans think and as long as the group of privileged political elite remain in power, the more unlikely it will be that any significant improvement in the prevailing conditions will occur.

A complete restructuring of the whole socio-economic and socio-political environment is today certainly the biggest and most important challenge facing this country. 
 
South Africa’s economy has grown on average by 3.6 per cent over the past two decades. This pace of growth falls far short of what is needed to absorb the legions of currently unemployed people in South Africa.  

The necessary reforms will be painful, but deferring them will be even more painful. Far too long the ANC led Government, has deferred these tough decisions.

To quote the National Chairman of the Australian Protectionist Party, Andrew Phillips: “Despite noble announcements by the African National Congress (ANC) of its intent to make South Africa an egalitarian society in which all people could live in harmony and have equal opportunity, the reality is quite different. ... It is becoming increasingly clear the situation in South Africa warrants international attention once again"

The Western world was quick to take the moral high-ground against South Africa decades ago. Now is the time to expose their hypocrisy by refusing to exercise pressure and apply meaningful diplomatic pressure upon the ANC regime to bring about the long overdue changes so desperately needed in this country.  

South Africa’s Constitution is recognized throughout the world as one of the best constitutions in the world. Everybody involved was pleased and proud to have been a part of it. Two of our leaders were even awarded Nobel Peace Prizes.

But now it seems that most of our ANC leaders are uncomfortable with the Freedom Charter and the Constitution. They claim to live by the rule of law, but when the law isn’t on their side, they’re happy to bend, ignore, or even break it.

The ANC still claims that they want to reduce crime and corruption. That they want to improve the education and health systems. That they want to reduce unemployment and to provide homes for the homeless. But very little gets done about it!

In a previous article, “Suid-Afrika se krag in diversiteit”, I said that the only recipe for peace, prosperity and progress in this country, is the speedy return to the aspirations of the Freedom Charter and the adherence to the provisions of the Constitution. 

Its time that all South Africans once again unite around the noble ideals of the Freedom Charter.


The biggest evil in South Africa is that it is largely being driven by ignorance, bigotry and racism, instead of a mature, equitable vision for development and growth.


Friday 19 September 2014

Life's a journey. Enjoy the ride - there is no return ticket.




Life's a journey  -  Enjoy the ride.

There is no return ticket  

Stes de Necker



Do you realize that the only time in our lives when we like to get old is when we're kids? 

If you're less than 10 years old, you're so excited about aging that you think in fractions. 'How old are you?' ' I'm four and a half!' You're never thirty-six and a half. You're four and a half, going on five! That's the key.

You get into your teens, now they can't hold you back. You jump to the next number, or even a few ahead. 'How old are you?' 'I'm gonna be 16!' You could be 13, but hey, you're gonna be 16! 

And then the greatest day of your life! You become 21. Even the words sound like a ceremony. YOU BECOME 21. YESSSS!

But then you turn 30.  Oooohh, what happened there? Makes you sound like bad milk! He TURNED; we had to throw him out. There's no fun now, you're just a sour-dumpling. What's wrong? What's changed? You BECOME 21, you TURN 30, then you're PUSHING 40. Whoa! 

Put on the brakes, it's all slipping away. Before you know it, you REACH 50, and your dreams are gone....

But! wait! You MAKE it to 60. You didn't think you would! So you BECOME 21, TURN 30, PUSHING 40, REACH 50, and MAKE it to 60.

You've built up so much speed that you HIT 70! After that, it's a day-by-day thing; you HIT Wednesday!

You get into your 80's, and every day is a complete cycle; you HIT lunch; you TURN 4:30; you REACH bedtime. And it doesn't end there. Into the 90s, you start going backwards; 'I Was JUST   92.'

Then a strange thing happens.. If you make it over 100, you become a little kid again. 'I'm 100 and a half!'

May you all make it to a healthy 100 and a half!!

HOW TO STAY YOUNG 
 
1. Throw out nonessential numbers. This includes age, weight and height. Let the doctors worry about them. That is why you pay them.


2. Keep only cheerful friends. The grouches pull you down.

3. Keep learning. Learn more about the computer, crafts, gardening, whatever, even ham radio. Never let the brain idle. 'An idle mind is the devil's workshop.' And the devil's family name is   Alzheimer's.

4. Enjoy the simple things.  

5. Laugh often, long and loud. Laugh until you gasp for breath.

6. The tears happen. Endure, grieve, and move on. The only person, who is with us our entire life, is ourselves Be ALIVE while you are alive.

7. Surround yourself with what you love   , whether it's family, pets, keepsakes, music, plants, hobbies, whatever. Your home is your refuge.

8. Cherish your health: If it is good, preserve it. If it is unstable, improve it. If it is beyond what you can improve, get help.

9. Don't take guilt trips. Take a trip to the mall, even to the next county; to a foreign country, but NOT to where the guilt is.

10. Tell the people you love that you love them, at every opportunity. 

AND, ALWAYS REMEMBER:
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally used up and worn out, shouting
'FUCK ... what a ride!'


Refugees - the Casualties of Conflict




Refugees - the Casualties of Conflict


Stes de Necker


Today the world is still criticizing Germany for what Hitler did to 6 million Jews, 70 years ago, but remain silent about all the Treblinka's, Dachau's, Buchenwald', Auschwitz's, Birkenau' and Ravensbruck's we see in the world today.

The total number of people forcibly displaced worldwide has reached 45.2m people, the highest level in almost 20 years, according to a report published today by the UN's High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

The annual 'Global Trends' report shows that as of the end of 2012, more than 45.2m people were forcibly displaced compared with 42.5m at the end of 2011

Around 35.8m persons were of concern to the UNHCR by end 2012, the second highest number on record, according to their latest report. The highest figure since 1993, when recording keeping began, was in 2009 with 36.5m persons of concern.

According to the UNHCR report, the conflict in Syria has forced 647,000 people to flee mainly to neighbouring countries. This was the largest annual exodus by a single refugee group since 1999, when more than 867,000 people fled Kosovo.

Afghanistan continues to be the main source country of refugees with 2.6m by the end of 2012. 

Whilst Pakistan is host to 1.6m refugees, the largest number worldwide, Iran has the second largest number of refugees with 868,200.

The UNHCR state that in the last year, 23,000 people per day were forced to leave their homes due to conflict and persecution. Developing countries host more than 80% of the world's refugees

In 700 refugee camps currently spread all over the world, the same tragedies that were prevalent in the camps of Germany and all other POW Camps worldwide, are playing itself out each and every day, while the world looks on. In most instances, ‘passive murder and elimination’ have replaced the active murders which took place in the German and other camps 70 years ago.

Most of these refugees’ lives disappeared before them in the blink of an eye.

War, violence or fear for their family’s safety force them to flee their homes.

And after finding shelter far from their families and loved ones, they were forced to become dependent on handouts of food; possibly have no clean drinking water and no access to health care.  

It is in such desolate and precarious conditions that millions of people around the world, including the inhabitants of Camp Liberty and Camp Ashraf, must survive every day.


Thursday 18 September 2014

US PRIORITIES IN DISARRAY




US PRIORITIES IN DISARRAY

Stes de Necker



US House of Representatives Approves Resolution to Fund and Equip Syrian Rebels
MOSCOW, September 18 (RIA Novosti)

The United States House of Representatives passed a resolution authorizing $500 million to go to training and equipping moderate Syrian rebels to fight against Islamic State (IS) in the Middle East.The resolution passed Wednesday in a vote of 273-156.

The Islamic State, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), is a Sunni jihadist group that has been fighting the Syrian government since 2012, expanding its attacks to northern and western regions of Iraq in June 2014.

It is a fact that the Syrian situation is certainly critical, but how the US determines their priorities remains a mystery.

The Islamic State, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), is a Sunni jihadist group that has been fighting the Syrian government since 2012, expanding its attacks to northern and western regions of Iraq in June 2014. The militants have seized vast areas in both countries and proclaimed an Islamic caliphate on all the territories under their control.

On the other hand there is the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK).

Prior to the 2003 U.S.-led war in Iraq, the PMOI publicly declared its neutrality and played no part in the conflict. In the early part of the invasion, as a result of quid pro quo between Washington and Tehran, PMOI bases were repeatedly bombed by Coalition forces, inflicting dozens of casualties and enormous structural damage.

In April 2003, US forces signed a cease-fire agreement of "mutual understanding and coordination" with the PMOI. Finally in May 2003, as a result of negotiations between the PMOI and US forces led by General Ray Odierno, the PMOI agreed to a "voluntary consolidation" and disarming of its forces in exchange for US protection of Camp Ashraf and its residents.

After an extensive 16-month investigation of every member of the PMOI in Camp Ashraf by seven different US government agencies that began after the US agreement, PMOI members were found not to have violated any US law [New York Times, July 27, 2004]. In addition, the US Government declared them to have been "non-combatants" during the 2003 war.

In 2004 the US led Multi-National Force - Iraq (MNF-I) formally recognized all the residents of Camp Ashraf (which were later moved to Camp Liberty near Baghdad) as "Protected Persons" under the Fourth Geneva Convention [Coalition Statement, July 2004], and U.S. forces took up their protection.

In January 2009, despite strong opposition by the residents and several legal opinions by distinguished jurists, the camp's security was transferred to Iraq without any credible guarantees.
Today these refugees must survive the most terrible living conditions in Camp Liberty.

Residents have no freedom of movement, and Iraq has banned them from having access to their relatives, human rights activists, parliamentarians, reporters and any foreign visitor in Liberty or Ashraf.

Heavy medical restrictions are imposed on the camp residents, and this has led to the death of two residents by the start of 2013. The ground is gravel, and there are no pavements. The GoI does not permit contractors into the camp to build stable ramp entries for the disabled.

Residents are not allowed to use machinery and the GoI prevents them from transferring their forklifts from Ashraf to move items and do construction work in Camp Liberty. The residents are therefore forced to carry heavy loads by hand leading to numerous injuries.

Iraq refuses to connect the camp to the national electricity grid, and the few power generators that are in the camp are dilapidated. By December 2012, Liberty residents had paid $3.5 million for fuel for generators at the camp to provide electricity and $2.5 million for a water supply project.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on 23 November 2012 described conditions at Camp Liberty as synonymous with that of a detention centre and in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This was the second opinion adopted by the Working Group detailing abuses at the camp. Another opinion issued on 17 July 2012 found similar abuses taking place.

In 2012 the residents signed a deal with a British company to sell their moveable and fixed property for approx. $525 million, but this deal was blocked by the GoI which is trying to steal and misappropriate all the property.

The question remains how the US determines their priorities.

Why does the US not comply with their contractual obligations towards the residents of Camp Liberty who are in dire need of help and how is it possible that the House of Representatives can approve $500 million funding to aid rebel forces in Syria, (with whom they have no contractual obligations), but not come to the rescue of 3000 Iranian dissidents who have always been loyal and supportive of US policy?


IT IS TIME FOR THE US TO GET THEIR PRIORITIES IN ORDER!


Monday 15 September 2014

International Day of Democracy




International Day of Democracy
15 September 2014


Stes de Necker


Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 15, 2014

“There are few ideas more powerful – more infused with universal aspiration – than democracy.
The desire for democracy is shared by people the world over. The privilege to vote, the freedom to speak your mind, the right to a government by the people and for the people, these are ideas that continue to inspire – from the Egyptians who took to Tahrir Square, to democracy activists in Burma, to the brave Ukrainians who took to the ballot box earlier this year.

Today we recognize International Day of Democracy, a day set aside to a way of life that allows each and every citizen to participate in his or her government. This year’s theme – Engaging Young People on Democracy – powerfully underscores the importance of youth in building and preserving democracy.

Democratic societies are strong societies, because people are free to speak out against injustices and to discuss, debate, and work together to drive positive change – even with those who hold opposing views. In a democracy, we are free to choose our leaders, hold government institutions accountable, and work with those institutions to build a more stable and prosperous future for all members of our society.

As the United States works to strengthen our democracy at home, we will continue to support those around the world fighting for their voices to be heard.”

                                                                            ==========

 A few days ago I posted a comment on Facebook saying that democracy carries within itself the germ of its own destruction.

Today is International Day of Democracy and as much as I want to support and agree with Secretary Kerry, I regard it my duty to seriously warn all readers against Secretary Kerry’s unqualified statement that “In a democracy, we are free to choose our leaders, hold government institutions accountable, and work with those institutions to build a more stable and prosperous future for all members of our society.”

The previous Secretary General of the UN said that as long as societies shout and scream, leaders would tend to listen. But when society does not continuously scream and shout at their leaders, the leaders seem to get complacent and start doing what they want.

Today Iran and Iraq stand as grim reminders of so called Parliamentary Democracies gone terribly wrong.

Last night we learned that Brazil has now been taken over by a Communist Regime, only to read today (15/09/2014) that there are already some American politicians who are already concerned about the expansion of Communism so close to America.

Western Democracy, as we know it, is only as strong as the people living under it, are prepared to protect and safeguard their democratic rights and privileges.


A COMPLACENT DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IS A DYING SOCIETY.  


    

History of Camp Liberty - Baghdad Iraq




History of Camp Liberty - Baghdad  Iraq


Stes de Necker



Camp Ashraf has for over 25 years been home to thousands of members and sympathizers of Iran's main opposition group, the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). The camp is situated north of the Iraqi town of Al-Khalis in Diyala Province, about 44 miles from Iran's Western border.

Ashraf was created in 1986, after the PMOI leadership relocated from France to Iraq. 

It began as barren land with only a handful of deserted buildings and no facilities, paved roads, or running water. Over 25 years, however, Ashraf was built by its residents into a modern city with a complex of roads and buildings with many educational, social and sports facilities, and it became the PMOI's main enclave in Iraq.

Camp Ashraf, or Ashraf City as its residents know it, was named after Ashraf Rajavi, a famous political prisoner at the time of the Shah who was among the last group of political activists released from the Shah’s prisons in 1979.

Camp Ashraf is an unexpected site in the Iraqi desert.

Christine Aziz, a British journalist who visited it, said on December 28, 2006:
“Ashraf is 14 square miles of impeccable tidiness. The first impression is of a holiday camp rather than a military base. Eucalyptus trees line long driveways, men and women tend gardens, and there’s the smell of bread from the bakery.”

The Los Angeles Times wrote about Ashraf on 19 March 2005:
“MEK members have built a bustling, idyllic sprawl of self-contained mini-villages with barracks-style living quarters, dining halls, recreational facilities and carefully maintained gardens. Camp Ashraf has its own swimming pool, library, monument to fallen comrades and a museum where visitors can view gruesome videos of Iranian regime brutality.… Whatever their idiosyncrasies, MEK members also project a progressive streak and political ethos unusual in the world, much less the Middle East. They’re ardent feminists. Women make up 30 percent of the fighters but hold an outsized number of political and military leadership positions.… Far from the noise, traffic jams and ambient daily dread of Baghdad, Ashraf feels like a quiet rural retreat. Earlier this week, the entire camp mobilized for a raucous celebration of Red Wednesday, a pre-Islamic holiday that precedes the Iranian New Year.”

One remarkable characteristic of Ashraf was the presence of thousands of people who have freely chosen to come to Ashraf with only one goal and desire—to dedicate their lives to their people’s freedom from the clutches of the mullahs’ terrorist religious dictatorship.

This free choice was the bedrock of the democratic relations in Ashraf and within the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran.

For any foreign observer who visited Ashraf, the most striking characteristic is the democratic nature of relationships that existed there, since in this city precious human values were respected the most. The democratic nature of relationships within the PMOI has given Ashraf residents the ability to maintain their unity under harsh conditions of the past 25 years, which includes aerial bombardment and missile attacks by the mullahs’ regime. Diverse opinions converge through dialogue, and evolve to what is acceptable to all members; thus, the enormous efforts by the Iranian regime to create rifts among the ranks of the PMOI and to overwhelm Ashraf have failed.

Foreigners were always are astounded at the high morale in Ashraf. Such a level of liveliness under such difficult conditions comes from the depth of the resident’s conscious decision to remain in Ashraf and their profound belief in freedom.

Ashraf residents’ smiles defied the difficult political conditions and atmosphere. However, neither these conditions nor the unfavourable climate, nor the three decades of suppression and killings by the mullahs’ regime and over two decades of appeasement and support for the regime by Western governments, have been able to wipe their smiles away. This liveliness were part of their struggle against the mullahs’ regime.

The residents of Ashraf enjoyed excellent community relations with the people of surrounding towns and villages in Diyala province. Ashraf invested heavily in infrastructure projects in the region. A water purification plant provided water to tens of thousands of people in surrounding towns. Local Iraqi residents were welcome at Ashraf medical clinics which served the local communities. An electricity grid and roads benefited the entire region.

Some 5.2 million Iraqis signed a petition in June 2006 warning of the Iranian regime's dangers in Iraq and describing the PMOI as the main bulwark against the regime's interventions. More than 3 million Iraqi Shiites signed a declaration in June 2008 calling for eviction of the regime and its agents from Iraq and the removal of restrictions imposed on PMOI members residing in Ashraf City. 

The Iranian regime has thus put immense pressure through its proxies to have the PMOI dismantled.

Prior to the 2003 U.S.-led war in Iraq, the PMOI publicly declared its neutrality and played no part in the conflict. In the early part of the invasion, as a result of quid pro quo between Washington and Tehran, PMOI bases were repeatedly bombed by Coalition forces, inflicting dozens of casualties and enormous structural damage.

In April 2003, US forces signed a cease-fire agreement of "mutual understanding and coordination" with the PMOI. Finally in May 2003, as a result of negotiations between the PMOI and US forces led by General Ray Odierno, the PMOI agreed to a "voluntary consolidation" and disarming of its forces in exchange for US protection of Camp Ashraf and its residents.

After an extensive 16-month investigation of every member of the PMOI in Camp Ashraf by seven different US government agencies that began after the US agreement, PMOI members were found not to have violated any US law [New York Times, July 27, 2004]. In addition, the US Government declared them to have been "non-combatants" during the 2003 war.

In 2004 the US led Multi-National Force - Iraq (MNF-I) formally recognized all the residents of Camp Ashraf as "Protected Persons" under the Fourth Geneva Convention [Coalition Statement, July 2004], and U.S. forces took up their protection.

The MNF-I reiterated its obligations towards Ashraf residents under the 4th Geneva Convention on numerous occasions. This can be seen in a February 16, 2006 letter by the then-Deputy Commanding General, and it is also specified in the October 7, 2005, letter by Maj. Gen. William Brandenburg which says: "The residents of Camp Ashraf have the right to protection from danger, violence, coercion, and intimidation, and to special protection for the dignity and rights of women."

In January 2009, despite strong opposition by the residents and several legal opinions by distinguished jurists, the camp's security was transferred to Iraq without necessary credible guarantees. The US stated that the Government of Iraq has given written guarantee respecting the rights of the residents.

On July 2009 and April 2011, the Iraqi Army under the direct order of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki launched deadly attacks on Camp Ashraf. The first attack left 11 Ashraf residents dead and nearly 500 wounded.

The 2011 attack - described by then U.S. Senator John Kerry, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as a "massacre" - left 36 dead and hundreds wounded. The attacks drew widespread condemnation from the international community.

Since 2009, the camp has been under a barbaric siege where delivery of food, fuel and medicine has been hampered and visits by family members, human rights organizations, residents' lawyers, and independent journalists have been disallowed. For nearly two years the Camp residents were constantly subject to psychological torture by agents of the Iranian regime using some 300 powerful loud speakers threatening the residents to death and using abusive word all through day and night.

Following an agreement between Ambassador Martin Kobler of UNAMI and the Government of Iraq, and at the behest of the Iranian regime, Ashraf residents were subject to a forced eviction and involuntary relocation to Camp Liberty, a former U.S.-base in Baghdad.

Martin Kobler, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General in Iraq, misled the residents and the international community by repeated assurances about the residents welfare and protection at the new site which has until now proved to be blatantly false.

In 2012, some 3,200 residents moved to Camp Liberty, but Iraq has denied them freedom of movement, basic humanitarian needs, and the right to transfer or sell most of their property.

Currently there are 100 residents in Camp Ashraf who remained to look after the property. According to an agreement with the UN, also endorsed by the US, the residents would remain there until all properties are settled.

Martin Kobler, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General in Iraq (SRSG), gave the residents repeated assurances about their welfare and protection at the new site. But the Government of Iraq (GoI) has imposed a siege on the camp and denied them the right to transfer or sell most of their property.

In violation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Iraq and the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI), Camp Liberty lacks human rights standards and is considered a prison from every aspect.

The area of the camp is half a square kilometre, and it is run by Iraqi Col. Sadeq Mohammad Kazem, who is wanted by a Spanish court for ordering his troops to open fire on Ashraf residents in the massacres of July 2009 and April 2011.

There is a central police station and at least five other police posts and uninterrupted patrols in the small camp. Surveillance cameras have been installed in various areas of the camp to control all commuting inside. The signals from these eavesdropping devices and spying cameras are transmitted to the Iranian regime, leading to serious security threats to the residents and their families in Iran.

Residents have no freedom of movement, and Iraq has banned them from having access to their relatives, human rights activists, parliamentarians, reporters and any foreign visitor in Liberty or Ashraf.

Heavy medical restrictions are imposed on the camp residents, and this has led to the death of two residents by the start of 2013. The ground is gravel, and there are no pavements. The GoI does not permit contractors into the camp to build stable ramp entries for the disabled.

Residents are not allowed to use machinery and the GoI prevents them from transferring their forklifts from Ashraf to move items and do construction work in Camp Liberty. The residents are therefore forced to carry heavy loads by hand leading to numerous injuries.

The camp lacks any plant life and vegetation and the adjacent green area was annexed off by the GoI.
Iraq refuses to connect the camp to the national electricity grid, and the few power generators that are in the camp are dilapidated. By December 2012, Liberty residents had paid $3.5 million for fuel for generators at the camp to provide electricity and $2.5 million for a water supply project.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on 23 November 2012 described conditions at Camp Liberty as synonymous with that of a detention centre and in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This was the second opinion adopted by the Working Group detailing abuses at the camp. Another opinion issued on 17 July 2012 found similar abuses taking place.

Mr. Tahar Boumedra, SRSG's advisor on Ashraf affairs, who was responsible for Ashraf at the UNAMI for three and a half years resigned in May 2012 in protest to Martin Kobler’s attempts to cover up violations of human rights at Camp Liberty.

In two shocking testimonies at the U.S. Congress on 13 September 2012 and the UK Parliament on 11 December 2012, Mr. Boumedra revealed how Ambassador Kobler would doctor reports to cover up the abuses.

The GOI obstructs the sale of the residents’ movable and immovable properties in Camp Ashraf and has blocked all their commercial activities.

In 2012 the residents signed a deal with a British company to sell their moveable and fixed property for approx. $525 million, but this deal was blocked by the GoI which is trying to steal and misappropriate all the property.

Instead of designating Camp Liberty as a refugee camp, the camp has been illegally designated a “temporary transit location - TTL” to cover up the appalling lack of minimum standards for a refugee camp and violation of laws and regulations related to refugees and asylum seekers. 

The term TTL applies to a camp which has a several-day or several-week passage for transferring refugees to third countries.


Many distinguished international jurists, Parliamentarians, former government officials, human rights advocates, and human rights organizations have urged the UN to urgently recognize Camp Liberty as an official Refugee Camp and accept responsibility for the residents’ protection and to ensure that their rights are respected under international law



.

Saturday 13 September 2014

CHANGE THE WAY YOU LOOK AT THINGS AND THE THINGS YOU LOOK AT, CHANGE




CHANGE THE WAY YOU LOOK AT THINGS
AND THE THINGS YOU LOOK AT, CHANGE

Stes de Necker


Someone asked me a very interesting question some time ago and that was, ‘What inspired you to come up with this saying?’

And this is what I told him:

My wife and I stayed on a farm for most of our lives and my two children also grew up on the farm.
My daughter always had this holy fear for spiders (almost an arachnophobia) and nothing anyone could do or say could change her mind. Many a time I was called to come and remove a spider from her room before there could be any talk of sleep.

I studied and read up on everything I could find about arachnophobia and the ways and means to do something about this fear of spiders.

I tried all the clever suggestions and advice, but nothing worked! Nothing I could do or say would change her mind.

One winter’s evening we were sitting in front of the fireplace and she was sitting on my lap, when a small little spider made his way up one of the logs which I used for making the fire. And true to tradition, I first had to do something about the spider before she would remain sitting with me.

And it was then when this insane idea got into my mind. What if I was to try and make up some ridiculous story, personifying the little fellow into something lovable she could relate to.

And there I started creating this sob story about a ‘Mommy Spider’ and a ‘Daddy Spider’ and their little ‘Baby Spider’, who lived on a farm, the same as ours, and their daily struggle against the threats and dangers on the farm.

I elaborated on the unfriendly environment and everyone and everything that were out there with the sole purpose to kill the spiders. Of all the birds that were after them for food for themselves and the babies and the large insects which use spiders to feed their larvae.

The story continued until I could see that she was very close to tears and then I stopped. She was always a very romantic little girl and I could see that I definitely hit the mark.

And low and behold, the next thing she did was to get off my lap, went over to the little spider and started consoling him about the cruel and unsympathetic world he has to live in!

She promised this little fellow that she would look after him and take care of him and that there was no more reason for him to be afraid of anything.

And to this day she has never harmed a spider! 

The interesting thing however, was the fact that I myself learned a very valuable lesson in the process which I apply in my own life every day. And that is the amazing results you can expect when you change the way you look at things.

Regardless if it is a problem or a challenge or whatever circumstance you must face in life, ‘change the way you look at it, and that what you are facing, change.


And usually for the better!



Friday 12 September 2014

NEPAL - JEWEL OF THE HIMALAYAS




NEPAL - JEWEL OF THE HIMALAYAS


Stes de Necker


Geography

Nepal is a landlocked country in Southern Asia, between the Tibet autonomous region of China and India. It contains 8 of the world's 10 highest peaks, including Mount Everest - the world's tallest - on the border with Tibet, and Lumbini, the birth place of Gautama Buddha, the founder of Buddhism.

A monarchy for hundreds of years, Nepal was declared a republic in June 2008.

Nepal has a very diverse geography, rising from less than 100 metres (328 ft) elevation in the tropical Terai—the northern rim of the Gangetic Plain, beyond the perpetual snow line to some 90 peaks over 7,000 metres (22,966 ft) including Earth's highest Mount Everest or Sagarmatha at 8,848m (29,029 ft).

Cities

Kathmandu — capital & cultural centre of Nepal, with the stupas at Boudhanath and Swayambhu

Bhaktapur — well-preserved historical city, centre of Nepali pottery making, no motorized vehicles allowed!

Biratnagar — this city is in eastern Nepal near Dharan and famous for political reason

Birgunj — business gateway between India and Nepal. It is in mid-southern Nepal

Boudhanath — (Boudha) Home of the largest Buddhist Stupa in Nepal and a very important place of pilgrimage & meditation for Buddhists, local Nepalis, & tourists.

Janakpur — a historical religious centre and home to the 500-year old Janaki Temple

Namche Bazaar — a Sherpa settlement located in the Solu Khumbu region - popular with trekkers

Nepalgunj — the main hub for the Mid- and Far-Western Development Region; Bardiya National Park is close-by

Patan — Beautiful, historic Patan Durbar Square was designated as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1979

Pokhara — picturesque lake-side town fast becoming the destination of choice for travellers due to the scenery, adventure sports, dining, hotels & live music scene 

Visiting Nepal

Tourist visas are available on arrival for citizens of most countries at the designated land borders for USD25, for 15 days, USD40 for 30 days and USD100 for 90 days . They can only be granted for a maximum of 150 days in each 12 month period.

As well as US dollars, other convertible currencies like the euro, Pound sterling and Australian dollars can also be used but some smaller entry points (like Birgunj) may not accept them.

All tourist visas are currently "multiple entry" type visa and permit multiple entries and exits during the period of validity.

Be aware that without permission voluntary services while on a tourist visa is strictly prohibited. It will be a punishable offence.

There is detailed information on the official website of Nepal Immigration, where you can download the appropriate forms.

Domestic Flights

There are now many airlines, offering frequent flights to several destinations include companies with beautiful names like Yeti air, Buddha Air and Cosmic Air. Destinations to and  from Kathmandu include places such as Pokhara, Biratnagar, Nepalganj, Lukla, Pokhara, Simikot, Jomsom, Janakpur and Bharatpur.

For bookings from outside Nepal, there are internet agents (like NepalAirFlightNepalFlightCentre) who can make bookings, take payment (credit/debit cards/Paypal) and then send e-tickets. Other than these agents, tickets can only be bought on arrival in Nepal so if you are flying at short notice it is necessary to be flexible on flight times/dates as the planes often get fully booked in advance. 

Note that cancellations and delays due to severe weather conditions do occur. If you have time, just board the next plane!

Language

The great biological and cultural diversity of present-day Nepal is matched by its linguistic diversity.

Nepal boasts a variety of living languages, many of which are remnants of the traditional Asiatic cultural amalgamation in the region. Impressively large number for a country with a small land mass like Nepal, it has more distinct and individual languages in one country than the whole of the European community.

The official language of Nepal is Nepali. It's related to Sanskrit, and other Indo-Aryan languages, and is normally written with the Devanagari script. While most Nepalis speak at least some Nepali, a large percentage of the population has as their mother tongue another language, such as Tharu around Chitwan, Newari in the Kathmandu Valley, and Sherpa in the Everest area.

Although Nepal was never a British colony, English is widespread among educated Nepalis.

Nevertheless learning even a few words of Nepali is fun and useful, especially outside of the tourist district and while trekking. As Asian languages go, Nepali has to be one of the easiest to learn, and the traveller making the effort isn't likely to make worse blunders than many natives with a different first language.

Etiquette

Greet people with a warm Namaste (or "Namaskar" formal version - to an older or high-status person) with palms together, fingers up. It is used in place of hello or goodbye. Don't say it more than once per person, per day. The least watered down definition of the word: 'The divine in me salutes the divine in you.'


Show marked respect to elders.



Monday 8 September 2014

MY RIGHT TO CHOOSE - MY RIGHT TO CHOOSE




MY RIGHT TO CHOOSE

Protecting my Basic Human Right of Freedom of Choice


Stes de Necker



The freedom of choice

Imagine going out for dinner and ordering a steak only to have the waiter tell you that you may not have it, that you must have fish instead. How would you feel?

The choice between a steak and fish may be a fairly benign one, but it demonstrates a very important characteristic of human nature: we don't like to be forced into decisions we're capable of making for ourselves.

We resist compulsion. Even when we face more serious decisions, ones with moral implications, it is important that we can choose for ourselves.

Disregard and contempt for this very important basic human right, have resulted in hordes of, not only unjust and unlawful acts, but also in a myriad of human rights abuses, suffering, marginalization, segregation and human tragedy. 
 
It is important to note however, that we must be very careful not to trample on another person’s rights, while we are in pursuit of our own. Everyone has the right to their own opinion and beliefs.
While we are "accountable" for our choices, there will always be consequences for those choices, both good and bad.

So while we are pursuing the protection of, what we believe are our inalienable right to choose and to do something in this regard, we must also respect the right of others not to do anything!

Doing nothing is a choice in itself, albeit not a very good one.

Neither is letting other people, society or political institutions make decisions for us. For example, just because many films portray intimacy before marriage as perfectly acceptable, doesn’t mean it is generally acceptable.

Our character will be developed and refined when we make choices based on what’s morally right despite the prevailing wisdom there really is much right and wrong in the world.

Truth isn’t relative and sin isn’t just some unenlightened person’s "value judgment.

Every year, hundreds of young men and women fall in love in India. They defy their parents, caste and religious considerations and traditions. Many of them elope and get married; some others also give in to family pressures and fall back into traditionally more acceptable roles.

The Bollywood film industry thrives on such stories. We have laughed and cried with many of these couples on our television screens.

The Supreme Court of India has however repeatedly come to the protection and aid of just such couples.

The World Health Organisation estimates that 21.6 million women worldwide undergo unsafe abortion procedures every year.

Unsafe abortion is defined as a procedure carried out by unskilled practitioners or conducted in an environment that lacks the minimal medical standards, or both. These procedures cause an average of 47,000 deaths each year - at least 13% of all maternal deaths - and result in serious complications or disability for millions more women, particularly in the developing world.

Mormons are encouraged to stand up for what they believe, regardless of prevailing opinion.
It may not be easy, popular, or fun. Sometimes taking a stand means subjecting yourself to ridicule, slander or even physical abuse.

In this kind of situation, every person should be able to rely on the institution and protection of his/her right to freedom of choice.  

Unfortunately this is not the case in the world we live in at the moment!

The inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all people of the human family, is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.

This basic Human Right should be protected much more vigorously as an inalienable legal right in national and international law.

The freedom of choice is an inalienable fundamental right to which every  person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being, regardless of their nation, location, language, religion, ethnic origin or any other status.

Claims for Fundamental Freedom of Choice in Value Participation

The overriding importance of freedom of choice in the shaping and sharing of all values is fortunately beginning to be articulated and established as authoritative general community expectation in a wide range of formal expressions at both the transnational and national levels.

The most important development in this regard is the Charter of International Basic Human Rights of the United Nations.

The Charter reaffirms "faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women,"and pledges to "promote social progress and better standards of life and larger freedom" and to "employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples."

Comparable regional expression is also found in the preamble of the American Convention on Human Rights which states that , "the essential rights of man are not derived from one's being a national of a certain State, but are based upon attributes of the human personality."

The European Convention on Human Rights expresses the profound belief in those Fundamental Freedoms which are the foundation of justice and peace in the world and are best maintained, on the one hand by an effective political democracy, and on the other by a common understanding and observance of the Human Rights upon which they depend.

In a more recent summation, the Proclamation of Teheran, adopted at the International Conference on Human Rights in 1968, solemnly reaffirmed that “The primary aim of the United Nations in the sphere of human rights, is the achievement by each individual of the maximum freedom and dignity”
Every country should grant each individual, irrespective of race, language, religion or political belief, freedom of choice and expression, of information, of conscience and of religion, as well as the right to participate in the political, economic, cultural and social life of his country.

The basic thrust in global community expectations toward protecting individual freedom of choice in all value processes is greatly fortified by the long history of developments within the constitutive processes of the different national communities. The continued insistence by so many peoples in different communities and cultures that authority can rightfully come only from the people is a direct expression of demand for freedom of choice in the power processes that affect all other processes.

It is this demand for freedom of choice, secure from arbitrary coercion, which underlies the whole 
historic panorama of constitutional reforms beginning with Greek and Roman liberalism and extending through the English, American, French, and Russian revolutions to the present era of the emancipation of former colonial peoples. 


Wednesday 3 September 2014

Connecting the dots between Al-Qaeda and Iran




Connecting the dots between Al-Qaeda and Iran

Stes de Necker
Source: Arab News By: Abdulrahman al-Rashed


It all began from the “Services Office” in Afghanistan where Osama Bin Laden used to work.

Thirty years ago, the office was responsible for the recruitment of Saudis and other Arab young men as militants to fight the Soviet army. After the withdrawal of the Soviets, the office was closed.

During the 1990s, Afghanistan almost vanished from the international radar. It appeared as if Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri had been waiting for this very moment and wasted no time in re-opening the office, however, under a new name “Al-Qaeda.”

Over the next two decades, the same base was used to misguide youths and to remotely manage a war. Interestingly, the organization remained active against all countries except Iran and Israel.

After the toppling of Taleban regime in 2001, Al-Qaeda abandoned the idea of a control center and transformed itself into a loose network comprising various groups like Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or Al-Qaeda in the Islamic State of Morocco, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

If we understand the modus operandi of the old services office, which was to recruit young men to fight against the Soviets, it will be easier for us to understand Al-Qaeda in its fight against the other camp. The difference is that the war is now directed by Tehran and the Syrian regime from behind the scenes. They have carried out similar operations using Shiite youths in Lebanon and Kuwait. One of their prominent fighters was Imad Mughniyyeh. They came 10 years before Al-Qaeda and carried out operations like airplane hijacking, abductions of foreigners in Beirut and even made attempts on the life of the Kuwaiti emir.
Iran knew that these activities would lead to a direct confrontation with the global as well as the regional powers. I think that the Iranians, in cooperation with Assad’s security agencies, have been secretly running Al-Qaeda.

Al-Qaeda began to target states that are hostile to Iran, like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the United States. Many Al-Qaeda leaders lived in Iran, like Saif Al-Adl and many others who fled Afghanistan, like Sulaiman Abu Gheith, and Bin Laden’s sons also moved to Iran. And not to forget two Saudi nationals, Nasir Al-Qar’awi and Majid Al-Majid. These people justified their moves by saying that they were using Iran to achieve their objectives.

It is in today’s Syria that we can see the true hand of Iran behind Al-Qaeda. Through its ISIS subsidiary, Al-Qaeda is trying to sabotage the Syrian revolution. They assassinated its leaders and attacked their areas. The ISIS won the Syrian war where Assad’s forces and Hezbollah’s militias, and Iraq’s Al-Haqq brigades failed.

For years we have been talking about “Al-Qaeda lie.” They have changed the true meanings of the holy war, or Jihad in Arabic. 

Iran succeeded in using these groups to attack and undermine its rivals and adversaries in the area.
Thanks to this phony jihad, ISIS is now the power that is ruling over Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, while constituting a threat to the Gulf countries and Yemen, and persuading the Americans that they hold all the cards in the game.


Tuesday 2 September 2014

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PARIS - 1 SEPTEMBER 2014




INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
PARIS - 1 SEPTEMBER 2014

THE LEGEND OF ASHRAF

Stes de Necker
Maryam Rajavi


Maryam Rajavi
Resolving Iraq crisis is impossible without uprooting the Iranian regime and its terrorist groupings


“Growth of extremist terrorist groups in Iraq is the by-product of Iranian regime’s dominion and suppression by Maliki and offering a role to this regime in reining in the crisis will stir up a still greater catastrophe.

Through regional crisis mullahs are looking to delay signing the final nuclear agreement or to extract concessions that would leave open the path to the atomic bomb.

Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, said on Monday, September 1: The fall of Maliki in Iraq is a strategic blow to the mullahs’ regime which came about through the resistance of the Iraqi people and as such the regime’s chief launch pad for exporting fundamentalism has crumbled. Now, while Khamenei and Maliki are doing their outmost to turn back the clock, in fact a return to the previous balance of power in Iraq is impossible.

Mrs. Rajavi who was speaking at an international conference in Paris titled “First Anniversary of Ashraf massacre, Middle East in crisis, threats and solutions” noted: The new Iraqi government will be tested by the degree to which it distances itself from the Iranian regime and allows participation by the representatives of all sectors of the Iraqi society, as well as in holding truly free elections under the auspices of the United Nations uninhibited by the Iranian regime’s influence. 

At the presence of international figures from the United States, Europe and the Middle East, Rajavi noted that the growth and expansion of extremist terrorist groups, before all else, is the by-product of Iranian regime’s dominion over Iraq and suppression by Maliki. Thus, confronting ISIS without evicting the regime of Velayat-e faqih and its terrorist groupings from Iraq is fruitless. The murderous rampage and brutality of ISIS in the massacre of the Yazidis and the Christians and the beheading of journalists that have scarred the conscience of the world is the other side of the coin of the crimes perpetrated by Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, Kata’ib Hezbollah and the 9 Badr who are concurrently slaughtering prisoners, blowing up mosques, massacring worshipers, and pillaging and terrorizing people.

Rajavi stated: The catastrophes that are taking place in Iraq today emanate from the fact that the U.S. gave a share of governance of Iraq to the Iranian regime and by withdrawing its forces, completely handed over that country to the mullahs. She warned that those who are calling for the Iranian regime to play a role in containing the Iraqi crisis are setting the stage for an even greater catastrophe and is like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. Through its deceitful support for the global desire to confront ISIS, the Iranian regime is trying to restore its damaged dominion in Iraq.

Mrs. Rajavi stressed that the terrorism that has engulfed the Middle East today is the outcome of inaction by the West in face of tyrants, especially the Iranian regime. Such inaction has emboldened this regime to augment its meddling in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon by storming into Yemen; dispatching its clerics and revolutionary guards and in effect occupying large swaths of that country.

Speaking on the nuclear negotiations she said: Cultivating on the regional crisis, the Iranian rulers are looking to either delay the signing of the final agreement or to extract concessions that would preserve their ability to obtain the nuclear bomb. Any agreement that does not include the complete implementation of the UN Security Council resolutions, a total halt to enrichment, and allows snap inspections will leave the path open for the regime to obtain the nuclear bomb. 

The participants commemorated 52 Ashraf Mojaheds who were massacred by Maliki’s forces on September 1 last year, as well the seven others, including six women, who were taken hostage. The speakers warned of the imminent perils that threaten Camp Liberty resident and called on the United States and the United Nations to live up to their commitments regarding the safety and security of 2800 refugees who are all protected persons and to compel the Government of Iraq to remove the anti-human blockade against Camp Liberty, in particular entry of fuel, food and medicine. The speakers underlined the fact that the international community should not remain silent in the face of crime against humanity and thus allow another humanitarian catastrophe to unfold at Camp Liberty.

In this conference, in addition to Mrs. Rajavi, the following offered speeches: From the United States: General Hugh Shelton, Chairman of the Army Joint Chiefs of Staff (1997-2001); Tom Ridge, first Secretary of Homeland Security; Edward Rendell, former Chairman of the Democratic National Committee and Governor of Pennsylvania; Michael Mukasey, Attorney General (2007-2009); Patrick Kennedy, member of House of Representatives (1995-2011); from the European Parliament: Tunne Kelam, Julie Ward and Judith Kirton-Darling MEPs; from Algeria: Sid Ahmed Ghozali, former Prime Minister; from Syria: Haitham al-Maleh, Chairman of Judiciary Bureau of National Coalition; Hakim Nazir, Secretary of Political Bureau of National Coalition; from Netherlands: Adrianus Melkert, Special Representative of UN Secretary-General for Iraq (2009-2011); from France: Rama Yade, former French Minister for Human Rights and Vice President of Radical Party; Dominique Lefebvre, member of French National Assembly; Jean-Francois Legaret, Mayor of Paris 1st District; Yves Bonnet, former Head of DST; Jean-Pierre Brard, former Senator; Judge Francois Colcombet, joint Chief of French Committee for a Democratic Iran; Cynthia Fleury, neo-philosopher. 


In this conference Robert Torricelli, former member of the U.S. Senate and the legal representative of Ashraf and Liberty residents who presided over this program read out the letter of Tareq al-Hashimi, former Vice-President of Iraq, to the President of the United States and the Secretary-General of the United Nations which condemns the massacre on September 1 of 52 Mojaheds who resided in Ashraf. In this letter, Mr. Hashimi calls for an independent probe into this crime and the referral of its perpetrators to an international court. Senator Torricelli also read out the letter of 35 representatives of the parliament of Iraq in this respect.”

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
September 1, 2014