Postings

Thursday 27 August 2015

RISE IN SEA LEVELS Sea Level Rise Predicted To Be Larger Than Originally Thought




RISE IN SEA LEVELS

Sea Level Rise Predicted To Be Larger Than Originally Thought

This may spell the end of the Maldives Islands


Stes de Necker
Caroline Reid



There had been a consensus that sea levels would rise between 30 and 90 centimeters (one to three feet) by the end of the century.  That was in 2013. 

Now, with even more data to work with, researchers suggest that the rise is more likely to be at the higher end of that range. This prediction has come from new visualizations of sea level variations all over the globe.

While some regions, such as the west coast of the U.S., have seen a decrease (due in part to shifting ocean currents), the majority of the globe is experiencing sea level rise.  Josh Willis, an oceanographer at NASA, explains why in a statement, and warns residents on the west coast of the U.S. not to get comfortable:

 “Sea level along the west coast has actually fallen over the past 20 years because long-term natural cycles there are hiding the impact of global warming. 

“However, there are signs this pattern is changing. We can expect accelerated rates of sea level rise along this coast over the next decade as the region recovers from its temporary sea level ‘deficit.’”

One of the contributors to sea level rise is the melting of ice sheets.

The biggest is the Antarctic ice sheet, which covers an area of almost 14 million square kilometers (5.4 million square miles) and is larger than the United States and India combined.

Over the last decade, it has shed an average of 118 gigatons of ice a year – no small amount of water.
Smaller, but by no means less important, is the Greenland ice sheet.

Covering a more modest 1.7 million square kilometers (660,000 square miles), it has actually shed almost three times as much ice over the last decade as the Antarctica sheet – 303 gigatons a year on average. 

The mass of ice loss of Greenland's ice sheet.

In order to learn everything they can about the melting caps, NASA started the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) project. (Willis, the project leader, confessed that this acronym was "barely squeezed past the censors.")

The project is analyzing how warm ocean water is speeding up the loss of Greenland's glaciers.
It is too soon to confirm whether this fast rate of ice loss is here to stay. “We’ve seen from the paleoclimate record that sea level rise of as much as 3 meters (10 feet) in a century or two is possible, if the ice sheets fall apart rapidly,” said Tom Wagner, the cryosphere scientist at NASA's headquarters in Washington. “We’re seeing evidence that the ice sheets are waking up, but we need to understand them better before we can say we’re in a new era of rapid ice loss.”

With the global population growth not showing any signs of slowing down, and a lot of inhabited space at risk of being submerged by the end of the century, it is more important than ever to figure out how exactly the ocean levels are going to rise.

The data NASA is collecting may help nations predict how their populations will likely be affected and assist plans to counteract the effects of rising sea levels.

If this trend continues, which by all indications it will, that will mean the end of the Maldives Islands.

The highest point above sea level on the Maldives is only one meter!





THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CREED AND CODE OF HONOUR




THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CREED AND CODE OF HONOUR



STES DE NECKER


The Knights Templar are true to their creed and just to their country, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion, yielding obedience to the laws which afford them protection.

Let not interest, favour or prejudice bias their integrity or influence them to be guilty of a dishonourable action, but let their conduct be uniform and their deportment suitable to the dignity of their fraternal order.

Above all, they shall practice fortitude, prudence, temperance, and honour.
For these virtues have distinguished The Knights Templar in every age and nation.

==================================

This creed is my marrow.

Am I not also garbed in the creed, for it tells me what I wear.

The Creed is within me and about me.

It is my hand when I fight and tells me what my weapons are; within and without.

A Knight Templar is truly a fearless knight, and secure on every side, for his soul is protected by the armour of faith, just as his body is protected by the armour of steel.

He is thus doubly-armed, and need fear neither demons nor men.

Fortitude, Prudence, Temperance, and Honour are the fundamental principles embodied by this code, which sets forth obligations of ethical conduct.  

A Knights Templar shall comply with this code, and shall avoid association with any enterprises whose practices violate this code, and shall strive to uphold, maintain, and improve the integrity, reputation, and practices of the Knights Templar.    
   
The Chivalric Code of Honour

I shall defend the Knights Templar and the laws of the land.
I shall respect and defend the weak, the sick, and the needy.
I shall patriotically love and protect my country.
I shall not retreat from adversity nor from challenge.
I shall ceaselessly oppose evil and deceit.
I shall perform scrupulously my civic duties
I shall remain faithful to my pledged oath.
I shall prudently give alms and aid.
I shall be everywhere and always the champion of right, good, and tolerance against injustice.











STES DE NECKER
26 August 2015














==========================








A SHORT HISTORY OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR




A SHORT HISTORY OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR

Stes de Necker


The medieval Knights Templar, best known to us today as the famed warriors of the Crusades, were a devout military religious Order that uniquely combined the roles of knight and monk in a way the Western medieval world had never seen before.

Originally they were known as the Poor Knights of Christ and the Temple of Solomon, or, more simply, as the Knights Templar.

In a famous letter written in the 1130s, In Praise of the New Knighthood, St Bernard of Clairvaux elevated the Templar Order above all other Orders of the day, establishing the image of the Templars as a fierce spiritual militia for Christ. He regarded them as a “new species of knighthood, previously unknown in the secular world…” To him, they were a unique combination of knight and monk; to later historians, they were the first military order, soon imitated by the Knights Hospitaller, by several Spanish orders and, by the end of the 12th century, by the Teutonic Knights.

As a holy militia fighting for Christ, the Templars were willing to put aside the usual temptations of ordinary secular life for an arduous, dedicated life of service. Ever since then, the legacy of the Templars has been, first and foremost, the concept of service.




The Templars officially originated in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem in 1118 A.D., when nine knights, mainly French, vowed to protect pilgrims on the dangerous roads leading to Jerusalem.

These courageous knights gained the favor of King Baldwin II of Jerusalem who granted them part of his palace for their headquarters, which was located in the southeastern part of the Temple Mount, called “Solomon’s Temple”.

Encouraged by King Baldwin II and Warmund of Picquigny, Patriarch of Jerusalem, they were generally seen as complementary to the Hospitallers (recognized as an Order of the Church by the papacy in 1113, but not militarized until the 1130s), who cared for sick and weary pilgrims in their convent in Jerusalem. The Templars’ services were welcomed and greatly appreciated.

But it is important to realize that at this early juncture when they were based at the Temple Mount area, the Templars were not yet an official monastic Order—the protagonists were seculars imbued with a desire to fulfill the biblical injunction to love thy neighbour, but they were not yet a monastic Order. 

During the first nine years of the Order (1119-28), contrary to assumptions often made today, the Templars would not have been wearing their trademark white mantles, as they began wearing them after the church Council of Troyes in 1129 when they were given a religious Rule and a white mantle.

The famous red cross on their mantle was added later when Pope Eugenius III (1145-53) allowed them to wear it as a symbol of Christian martyrdom. 

With only nine knights at their inception, scholars acknowledge that it seems as though no major efforts were made to recruit any new members until around 1128, when most of the original knights had returned to France and the Council of Troyes began (Jan. 1129) and they became officially recognized by the papacy. By the 1170s, there were about 300 knights based in the Kingdom of Jerusalem itself and more in other areas., and by the 1180s, there were at least 600 knights in Jerusalem alone. After 1129, the Order grew exponentially with many thousands of knights and it then became increasingly powerful. 

At the Council of Troyes in Champagne, the status of the Templar Order underwent a dramatic change.Thanks to the significant contribution of Bernard of Clairvaux, the knights were then officially accepted by Matthew of Albano, the papal legate. This recognition was quite extraordinary for the times, as for such a tiny Order of only nine men to get this type of recognition was rather unusual, as many other Orders of the day had to wait much longer to achieve a similar status.

At the Council of Troyes, the Templars were given a proper Rule, written in Latin, which ran to 72 clauses. The impetus given by papal approval and the extraordinary publicity generated by the visits of the leaders to France, England and Scotland in the months before the council ensured that the “New Knighthood” would long outlive its founders. 

Papal recognition at Troyes was followed by the issue of three key bulls, which established the Temple as a privileged Order under Rome.

Omne Datum Optimum (1139) consolidated the Order’s growing material base by allowing spoils taken in battle to be retained for the furtherance of the holy war, placing donations directly under papal protection, and granting exemption from payment of tithes. It also strengthened the structure of the Order by making all members answerable to the Master and by adding a new class of Templar priests to the existing organization of knights and sergeants.

The Templars could now possess their own oratories, where they could hear divine office and bury their dead. Milites Templi (1144) ordered the clergy to protect the Templars and encouraged the faithful to contribute to their cause, while at the same time allowing the Templars to make their own collections once a year, even in areas under interdict.

Milita Dei (1145) consolidated the Order’s independence of the local clerical hierarchy by giving the Templars the right to take tithes and burial fees and to bury their dead in their own cemeteries.

As these privileges indicate, during the 1130s, the fledging Order had attracted increasing numbers of major donors, for it proved to be especially popular with that sector of the French aristocracy which held castles and estates and could mobilize vassals, albeit on a modest scale. In fact, the scale of this sudden, unprecented rise was extraordinary, something hardly seen before or since. The rulers of Aragon and Portugal, confronted directly with the problems of warfare on a volatile frontier, realized their military value more quickly than most others.

The Templars began to accumulate a substantial landed base in the West, not only in Francia, 

Provence, Iberia and England, where they were first known, but also in Italy, Germany and Dalmatia and, with the Latin conquests of Cyprus from 1191 and of the Morea from 1204, in those regions as well. By the late 13th century they may have had as many as 870 castles, preceptories and subsidiary houses spread across Latin Christendom. During the 12th and 13th centuries these properties were built into a network of support which provided men, horses, money and supplies for the Templars in the East. 

The development of a role as bankers arose out of these circumstances, for they were well placed to offer credit and change specie through their holdings in both east and west. It was a short step to move into more general finance, unconnected to crusading activity by the 1290s their house in Paris could offer a deposit bank with a cash desk open on a daily basis and specialist accountancy services of great value to contemporary secular administrations. Thus, the Templars became the bankers to nobles, kings, and Popes as well as to pilgrims on their way to and from Jerusalem and other holy sites.

Our familiar “traveller’s check” today is a modern-day example of using a ‘letter of credit’ –just as the Templars did in the 12th century, in medieval times.

The Templar structure was cemented by effective communications including its own Mediterranean shipping. They had many galleys and like the Hospitallers, took part in naval warfare at times, too. They even had their own Admiral by 1301.

Together with the Hospitallers, the Knights Templar became the permanent defenders of the Latin settlements of the East, increasingly entrusted with key castles and fiefs.

By the 1180s, there were approximately 600 knights in Jerusalem, Tripoli and Antioch, and perhaps three times that number of sergeants. No major battle took place without their participation.

In the 13th century, the Order was the only institution capable of building great castles like Athlit (Pilgrims’ Castle) (1217-21) on the coast to the south of Haifa and Safed (early 1240s) dominating the Galilean Hills. Such military and financial power, together with the extensive papal privileges, gave them immense influence in the Latin East and, at times, led to conflict with other institutions.

The Latin Rule of 1129, which had been influenced by a monastic establishment with little 
experience of practical crusading, soon proved inadequate for such an expanding organization. New sections, written in French, were added, first in the 1160s, when 202 clauses definted the hierarchy of the Order and laid down its military functions and then, within the next twenty years, a futher 107 clauses on the discipline of the convent and 158 clauses on the holding of chapters and the penance system. Between 1257 and 1267, 113 clauses set out case histories which could be used as precedents in the administration of penances’.

The existence of a version of the Rule in Catalan, dating from after 1268, shows that efforts were made to ensure that its contents were widely understood within the Order. Although the Order never underwent a thorough internal reform, these developments indicate that the Templars were not oblivious to the need to maintain standards.

The Templar Order’s administration was structured hierarchically. The Grand Master was based at the Order’s headquarters in the Holy Land, along with the other major officers, each of whom had their own staff. The Seneschal was the Grand Master’s deputy; in ceremonies he carried the famed beauseant, the Templars’ black-and-white banner. Like the Grand Master, the Seneschal had his own staff and horses. The Marshal was the chief military officer, responsible for the individual commanders and the horses, arms, equipment and anything else involving military operations. He also had authority in obtaining and ordering supplies, which was critically important at the time of the Crusades.

The Commander of the Kingdom of Jerusalem was the treasurer of the Order and was in charge of the strong room. He shared power with the Grand Master in a way that prevented either from having too much control over funds. The Draper issued clothes and bed linen and could distribute gifts made to the order. He was not only keeper of the famed white mantles but also ensured that every brother was dressed appropriately. These four, along with the Grand Master, were the major officers of the Order, although there seems to have been some local variation where needed.

Under these main officers were other Templar commanders with specific regional responsibilities, such as the commanders of the cities of Jerusalem. Daily administration of the Order’s regional houses was governed by various officials called bailies, and the officer in charge was called the baili.

So, the Templar Order consisted of members in a variety of positions performing many different functions. It even hired some assistants from outside the Order, and, contrary to popular belief, only a minority of members were actually full-fledged Knights.

 The loss of Acre in 1291 and the Mamluk conquest of Palestine and Syria have often been seen as a turning-point in Templar history, for the Order was apparently left without a specific role in a society still profoundly imbued with the idea of its own organic unity.

Indeed, the failure of the military orders to prevent the advance of Islam had attracted criticism since at least the 1230s with the loss of the Christian hold on the mainland, opponents were provided with a specific focus for their attacks.

The more constructive of these critics advocated a union of the Temple and the Hospital as the first step in a thorough reassessment of their activities, although the Orders themselves showed little enthusiasm for such schemes.

There was, however, no suggestion that either order be abolished. In fact, the Templars continued to pursue the holy war with some vigor from their based in Cyprus for they did not see the events of 1291 as inevitably presaging the decine of crusading.

The attack on them by Philippe IV, King of France, in October 1307, ostensibly on the grounds of “vehement suspicion” of heresy and blasphemy, therefore owes more to the potent combination of a king afflicted by a morbid religiosity on the one hand and an administration in severe financial trouble on the other, than it does to any failings of the Templars. In fact, the Templars (unlike the Hospitallers) had never previously been accused of heresy. In the end, neither the limited intervention by Pope Clement V nor an energetic defense by some Templars, could save the Order, which was suppressed by the papal bull Vox in excelso in 1312. Its goods and properties were then transferred over to the Hospitallers.

Although the Order itself was suppressed, many of the knights fled and went underground, or joined other Orders. Their extraordinary legacy and memory still live on today, nearly nine centuries later. 

Chronology of Some of the Key Medieval Templar Order Events: 

1118-9 Official beginnings and emergence of the Order of the Temple; nine knights, led by Hugh de Payns, the first Templar Grand Master, present themselves to King Baldwin II in Jerusalem

1119-28 First nine knights remain in the Holy Land

1128 By this time, the early Templars return from the Holy Land; beginning of the Order’s unprecedented rise and influence

1129 Jan Council of Troyes; Rule of the Templar Order established

1130 Bernard of Clairvaux completes In Praise of the New Knighthood

1139 Templar Castles in the Holy Land completed Baghras, Darbask, Destroit, La Roche, de Roussel, Port Bonnet

1149-50 Gaza granted to the Templars

1153 Death of Bernard of Clairvaux

mid-1160s Hierarchical statutes added to the Templar Rule

late-1160s Statutes on daily monastic life, chapter meetings, and penances added to Rule

1191 Templar headquarters in the Latin East moved to Acre

1191-2 Templars occupy Cyprus

1217-21 Building of Atlit (Pilgrims’ Castle), a major Templar fortress in the Holy Land

1257-67 Additional penances added to the Templar Rule

1291 Aug Acre falls to the Mamluks; Templars evacuate Atlit and Tortesa

1307 Oct 13 Dawn raid and arrests of the Templars in France

1307 Oct 27 Pope orders all Christian kings to arrest the Templars

1308 Templars questioned and imprisoned in various areas

1309 Aug Papal commission begins in France

1310 Templar trial procedures begin

1311 Council of Vienne; Templar Order formally dissolved by Pope’s first bull, Vox in excelso, but charges against the order are “not proven”

1312 Pope’s second bull, Ad providam,transfers Templar property to the Hospitaller Order

1314 Mar Last Templar Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, and Preceptor of Normandy, Geoffroi de Charney, burned at the stake










Monday 24 August 2015

WILL YOU RECOGNISE YOURSELF WHEN YOU WALK INTO YOURSELF IN THE STREET




WILL YOU RECOGNISE YOURSELF
WHEN YOU WALK INTO YOURSELF IN THE STREET

Stes de Necker




Some scientists agree that if you should walk into yourself on the street, you wouldn't recognize that person as you, because our idea of what we look like (from pictures and reflections) is so different from what we actually look like.

It’s no wonder doppelgangers, meaning ‘double walker’ in German, hold a strange fascination for us.
Shakespeare, Dickens, Mark Twain and Alexander Dumas - among others - used them as plot devices in plays and novels.

In modern times, they’ve featured in films such as Richard Gere’s Sommersby, Kevin Kline’s Dave and even an episode of Friends where Ross met 'Russ'.

However, with 7.5 billion people in the world, even if our doppelganger actually exists, most of us will never set eyes on them.

Or take as an example the case of identical twins. When one of them looks at the other, do they see themselves or simply their twin brother or sister?  
  
So how and when are we able to recognise ourselves, our artistic representation and experience of self portraits, and what happens when something goes wrong.

Recognising yourself in a mirror, drawing or portrait.

Cognitive Neuroscientist Professor Olaf Blanke, explains about the subject:

“Children’s understanding of mirrors comes fairly late in development (between months 15 and 24) and can show striking disparities. A child can recognise herself, passing the mark test (reaching to a trace of paint that is only noticeable when looking in a mirror), and then suddenly ask why ‘she’ is wearing the same jacket as hers. Passing the mark test might certainly be a good index of self-recognition, but failing the mark test is no evidence to the contrary.

Recognising oneself in a mirror probably requires the convergence of several cognitive skills. There is no ‘self-recognition’ module.

These abilities, for example: visuospatial coordination; visuo-kinesthetic integration; theory of mind, can develop in parallel, sequentially and/or hierarchically (i.e. one might be needed for another to appear). For instance, experimental evidence shows that tactile stimuli that are seen on another hand/body/face but at the same time felt on one’s own body induce an experience of ownership (this rubber hand is mine) or identification (this is my body/face). The same goes for motion: something moving in synchrony with our own movements can be learned to be self-attributed.

Interestingly, the ability to recognise oneself in a mirror can be lost after brain damage and is called mirrored self misidentification (a delusion in which patients perceive and conceive their reflection – usually in a mirror, but it has also been observed in ponds or windows – as an embodied stranger). In addition, healthy adults have all kinds of misconceptions about mirrors, so it is fair to say that the human brain is not really fine-tuned for this strange piece of optical-technology."

Remember the tale of Narcissus?

In Greek mythology, Narcissus was a Hunter from Thespiae in Boeotia who was known for his beauty. He was the son of the river god Cephissus and nymph Liriope.

He was proud, in that he disdained those who loved him.

Nemesis noticed this behavior and attracted Narcissus to a pool, where he saw his own reflection in the water and fell in love with it, not realizing it was merely an image. Unable to leave the beauty of his reflection, Narcissus drowned.

Narcissus is the origin of the term narcissism, a fixation with oneself and one's physical appearance.
What else happens when something goes awry in the brain?

Professor Blanke: "An interesting group of patients can have complex bodily hallucinations, where one can see one’s own body in front of oneself (like a sort of a hologram); perceive the environment from a perspective external to one’s physical body, usually elevated, and see one’s body back in, for example, one’s bed; or even switch perspectives between one’s physical body and a hallucinated body. Sometimes, multiple bodies are perceived, with the patient not necessarily considering them as ‘self’, but still feeling a strong attraction and relation to them.

In addition, other patients can feel as though somebody is standing right behind them, moving in the same way, although no one is there.

These manifestations seem to reflect a deficient mechanism by which the brain mis-localises or duplicates different components of the representations of our bodies.

The act of depicting oneself/others visually or verbally is even more complex.

It is not only visual features and bodily information that should be taken into account here, but also emotional aspects (memories, feelings, beliefs).

Perceiving, imagining one’s body and depicting it are not necessarily based on the same mechanisms. Patients with eating disorders perceive their bodies and draw themselves differently from how they are seen by others.

Curiously, if asked to point to the tips of your fingers, knuckles and the wrist while keeping your hand under the table you will get quite a distorted picture of your hand (e.g. underestimation of finger length, overestimation of hand width). You will, however be very accurate in judging whether an image of a hand is wider or narrower than your own.

Such observations show a difference between the consciously perceived and implicitly stored body image. Also, subtle differences in the image of one-self modulate self-perception and self-representation.

A mirror-reversed image of one’s face is more familiar than a non-reversed view. Both artists and non-artists seem to prefer self-portraits showing their left side. In the general population the detail of self-portraits seems to change with age.

And finally, when encountering yourself in a dream, no visual resemblance at all is needed for you to never doubt that the character was you until waking up. “

Recognising yourself in the street

Recognising yourself in the mirror or portrait seem to be one thing, but recognising yourself in a real life situation, for instance walking into yourself on the street, seems to be quite a different story.

To a large extent the jury is still out on this question and it can be safely assumed that they will not be back for some time soon, for the simple reason that meeting yourself physically on the street is simply not possible.

But it makes for some nice speculation, doesn’t it?










Saturday 22 August 2015

CANCER FREQUENCY BY COUNTRY Age-standardized rate for all cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and total cost of treatment




CANCER FREQUENCY BY COUNTRY

Age-standardized rate for all cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and total cost of treatment for the United States

(WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND INTERNATIONAL)


Stes de Necker




Data for cancer frequency by country.

There were an estimated 14.1 million cancer cases around the world in 2012, according to the World Cancer Research Fund International.

The for men and women combined was 182 per 100,000 in 2012.

The rate was higher for men (205 per 100,000) than women (165 per 100,000).

Of those cases, the United States had the sixth highest number of new diagnoses, with 318 cases per 100,000 people.

Both sexes

The highest cancer rate for men and women together was found in Denmark with 338 people per 100,000 being diagnosed in 2012.

The age-standardised rate was at least 300 per 100,000 for nine countries (Denmark, France, Australia, Belgium, Norway, United States of America, Ireland, Republic of Korea and The Netherlands).

The countries in the top ten come from Europe, Oceania, Northern America and Asia.


Rank
Country
Age-Standardised Rate per 100,000 (World)
1
Denmark
338.1
2
France (metropolitan)
324.6
3
Australia
323.0
4
Belgium
321.1
5
Norway
318.3
6
United States of America
318.0
7
Ireland
307.9
8
Korea, Republic of
307.8
9
The Netherlands
304.8
10
New Caledonia
297.9
11
Slovenia
296.3
12
Canada
295.7
13
New Zealand
295.0
14
Czech Republic
293.8
15
Switzerland
287.0
16
Hungary
285.4
17
Iceland
284.3
18
Germany
283.8
19
Israel
283.2
20
Luxembourg
280.3
21
Italy
278.6
22
Slovakia
276.9
23
United Kingdom
272.9
24
Sweden
270.0
25
Serbia
269.7
26
Croatia
266.9
27
Barbados
263.1
28
Armenia
257.0
29
Finland
256.8
30
French Polynesia
255.0
31
Austria
254.1
32
Lithuania
251.9
33
Uruguay
251.0
34
Spain
249.0
35
Latvia
246.8
36
Portugal
246.2
37
France, Martinique
245.0
38
Malta
242.9
39
Estonia
242.8
40
FYR Macedonia
239.3
41
Montenegro
238.3
42
Kazakhstan
236.5
43
Bulgaria
234.8
44
Poland
229.6
45
Romania
224.2
46
Belarus
218.7
47
Cuba
218.0
48
Japan
217.1
49
Argentina
216.7
50
Puerto Rico
211.1

Source: Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 16/01/2015.

Men

The highest cancer rate was found in France with 385 men per 100,000 being diagnosed in 2012.

The age-standardised rate was at least 350 per 100,000 in eight countries (France, Australia, Norway, Belgium, Martinque, Slovenia, Hungary and Denmark).

The countries in the top ten come from Europe, Oceania and the Americas.


Rank
Country
Age-Standardised Rate per 100,000 (World)
1
France (metropolitan)
385.3
2
Australia
373.9
3
Norway
368.7
4
Belgium
364.8
5
France, Martinique
358.4
6
Slovenia
358.2
7
Hungary
356.1
8
Denmark
354.3
9
United States of America
347.0
10
Czech Republic
345.9
11
Ireland
343.3
12
Korea, Republic of
340.0
13
Slovakia
338.2
14
Switzerland
337.9
15
New Caledonia
330.7
16
The Netherlands
327.8
17
Latvia
325.0
18
Germany
323.7
19
Estonia
321.9
20
Canada
320.8
21
New Zealand
320.1
22
Croatia
319.9
23
Israel
318.0
24
Italy
312.9
25
Spain
312.8
26
Lithuania
311.8
27
Luxembourg
309.1
28
Portugal
306.3
29
Armenia
305.6
30
Iceland
299.5
31
Serbia
299.2
32
Uruguay
297.5
33
Sweden
296.8
34
Austria
295.2
35
Finland
290.1
36
French Polynesia
287.4
37
United Kingdom
284.0
38
Kazakhstan
282.2
39
Barbados
277.2
40
Belarus
275.5
41
Trinidad and Tobago
273.5
42
Romania
271.0
43
Poland
269.2
44
Malta
267.7
45
FYR Macedonia
265.5
46
Montenegro
262.7
47
France, Guadeloupe
260.9
48
Bulgaria
260.5
49
Japan
260.4
50
Turkey
257.8

Source: Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 16/01/2015.

Women

The highest cancer rate was found in Denmark with 329 women per 100,000 being diagnosed in 2012.

The age-standardised rate was at least 280 per 100,000 for Denmark, United States of America, Republic of Korea, The Netherlands and Belgium.

The countries in the top ten come from Europe, Oceania, Asia and Northern America.


Rank
Country
Age-Standardised Rate per 100,000 (World)
1
Denmark
328.8
2
United States of America
297.4
3
Korea, Republic of
293.6
4
The Netherlands
289.6
5
Belgium
288.9
6
Ireland
278.9
7
Australia
278.6
8
Canada
277.4
9
Norway
277.1
10
France (metropolitan)
267.7
11
New Zealand
274.3
12
Iceland
274.2
13
New Caledonia
269.3
14
United Kingdom
267.3
15
Luxembourg
259.6
16
Czech Republic
258.9
17
Israel
258.7
18
Barbados
258.1
19
Italy
255.2
20
Germany
252.5
21
Slovenia
251.5
22
Sweden
248.7
23
Serbia
247.6
24
Switzerland
245.9
25
Slovakia
238.0
26
Hungary
236.5
27
Finland
234.2
28
Croatia
231.6
29
Malta
228.9
30
French Polynesia
227.3
31
Armenia
226.4
32
Lithuania
224.0
33
Bahamas
223.4
34
Austria
222.7
35
Uruguay
220.9
36
FYR Macedonia
220.8
37
Bulgaria
220.1
38
Montenegro
219.7
39
Kazakhstan
216.7
40
Argentina
211.8
41
Zimbabwe
209.1
42
Latvia
206.5
43
Poland
205.6
44
Estonia
202.7
45
Singapore
198.7
46
Cyprus
198.2
47
Spain
198.1
48
Portugal
198.1
49
Kenya
196.6
50
Mauritius
193.9

Source: Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on 16/01/2015.

Cost of treatment

In 2012, the reported spending on cancer treatment in the US was 124.6 billion dollars.

Assuming constant incidence, survival, and cost, the NCI (National Cancer Institute) projects 13.8 and 18.1 million cancer survivors in 2010 and 2020, respectively, with associated costs of cancer care of 124.57 and 157.77 billion 2010 US dollars.

This 27% increase in medical costs reflects US population changes only. The largest increases were in the continuing phase of care for prostate cancer (42%) and female breast cancer (32%). Projections of current trends in incidence (declining) and survival (increasing) had small effects on 2020 estimates.

However, if costs of care increase annually by 2% in the initial and last year of life phases of care, the total cost in 2020 is projected to be $173 billion, which represents a 39% increase from 2010.

Terrifyingly, almost one in two people will get the dreaded disease, and the numbers are only getting worse.  Here are some quick stats for background:

1. Nearly half of all Americans will develop cancer in their lifetime. Quick math tells us that is an astonishing 157 million victims.

2. Over half a million people in America died of cancer in 2012.

3. In 2011, cancer was the number 1 cause of death in the Western world, and number 2 in developing countries.

4. Cancer is the number 1 cause of childhood death in the United States.