Postings

Thursday, 30 October 2014

E-CIGARETTES - Around 95% Less Harmful Than Regular Smoking





 E-CIGARETTES

Around 95% Less Harmful Than Regular Smoking



Stes de Necker







From the ripe age of about six years and starting your school career in grade I, chances are very good that the first organs in your body you learned about, were the lungs.

Which of us haven’t seen, or were expected to learn, the following diagram of the human lungs:




After this initial introduction, chances are that, save for a few incidental references to the physiology of the human lung, you will hardly ever again hear about the workings of the lungs.

That is until that inevitable first time that you will be confronted with the evils of smoking!

Oh my goodness, and what a terrible day that was .......

Pictures of the most rotten lungs you have ever seen; People lying in hospital with emphysema; Patients hooked up to oxygen tanks and whatever other frightening pictures you can think off. Enough to stop any potential smoker dead in his tracks.

But has anyone up to now actually explained to the fear stricken smoker or potential smoker, what the real dangers are and what actually happens in the event of smoking? Chances are slim that this has happened.......

So what are the facts?

Let me first hasten to say that I am no doctor or specialist on the issue of tobacco smoking. What I wish to share with you is my personal experience when I was confronted with the possibility of having some lung defect.

After some time of regularly waking up with a rather bad cough and a rather large amount of phlegm in my lungs, I decided that it was time to visit a doctor and thanks heaven for the fact that he referred me to a medical technician for a Lung Function Test.

In essence this test measures the amount of air passing through the lungs and the efficiency of the lungs to absorb the amount of oxygen from the air in the lungs.

The results of the test are presented in a graph format looking as follows:




Where the blue dotted line represents the normal condition and the red line the test object’s results.
In other words, the more damage there is to the lungs, the less air can move through the lungs and the less oxygen can be absorbed by the lungs, causing a feeling of tightness in the chest and having to breathe faster in order to get enough oxygen from the air in the lungs.





1. Smoking

Traditional cigarettes are responsible for many illnesses and conditions and the harmful effects of cigarette smoking is well known. What is possibly not so well known though is that it's not the raw contents of the cigarette that are dangerous - it's the burning of the contents.

Smoking a traditional cigarette burns tobacco, and when tobacco is burnt it releases a dangerous cocktail of around 4,000 chemicals including Carbon Monoxide, Tar and even Arsenic, to name but a few. At least 80 of these chemicals are capable of causing cancer and hundreds of others are actually poisonous.

2. Tar

The main culprit for the damage caused to the lungs, is the tar content in the smoke that is being inhaled when smoking.

Tobacco contains an ‘oiliness’ which, when the tobacco leaf ‘burns’ is deposited in the form of a dark coloured tar. So the more ‘oil’ there is in the tobacco, the more tar will be deposited. That is why in most instances, the tar content of a cigarette is indicated on the cigarette package as a weight in milligrams. (ie. Tar content 9mg)

Tar being inhaled by the smoker obviously enters the lungs and because the lungs cannot dispose of the deposited tar, the tar then starts to remain in the ‘alveoli’ of the lungs and begins to accumulate thus blocking the alveoli ‘wall’ so that oxygen can no longer be absorbed from the air by the alveoli.

The more tar that consequently builds up within the alveoli, the less the alveoli are able to function and oxygen must now be absorbed by the next ‘tier’ of lung ways, which are the ‘bronchi’ and the process continues itself now in the bronchial tubes.

3. Nicotine

Nicotine in the tobacco smoke can, unlike the tar, be absorbed by the lungs.

Nicotine itself is of course a highly addictive drug and many smokers actually want to stop smoking but are unable to break this addiction.

However, nicotine plays no role in the damage caused to the lungs by the smoke!

Nicotine is absorbed in the blood and this is the drug that causes the brain to send out the ‘signal’ that it now wants more; in other words causing the ‘craving’ to smoke.

4. So how can the damage to the lungs be stopped?

The only way to stop any further damage to the lungs would be to remove the tar and other poisonous contents from the smoke before it enters the lungs.

And short of stop smoking all together, there is only one way to do this and that is by means of the so-called Electronic Cigarette.

 5. The Electronic Cigarette

The concept of the electronic cigarettes has been around since the early 1960's but it's only in recent years that manufacturing has been able to produce reliable working models. In 2003 the Chinese pharmacist Hon Lik developed the basis for the modern version that's widely in use today. He did this after the death of his father from lung cancer. The huge demand and popularity of electronic cigarettes has driven vast improvements in the last few years with many different models now available. 

In a nut shell an electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, is a device that simulates the act of smoking traditional cigarettes by producing a vapour instead of smoke. For this reason, "smoking" an e-cigarette is often referred to as "vaping". Vaping offers a genuine alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes by providing the same sensation and nicotine content (if required) but eliminates many of the harmful side effects of smoking.


The vapour that's produced by an e-cigarette has the appearance of cigarette smoke and can also share the same flavour and nicotine content of a traditional cigarette. The difference really is in the detail though; the vapour that's produced by an e-cigarette does not smell like smoke and more importantly, does not contain the 4000 or so toxic chemicals that are produced by a smoking a traditional cigarette, including Carbon Monoxide, Tar and even Arsenic 




Image of a typical Electronic Cigarette.


Are Electronic Cigarettes Safe?

A new report published in the U.K. has concluded that e-cigarettes are nowhere near as harmful as smoking. 

Carried out by Public Health England (PHE), the report found that e-cigarettes are “around 95% less harmful” than smoking tobacco, and that the National Health Service should consider recommending them to help people quit smoking all together.

They have also concluded that there is “no evidence” that they offer young people a gateway into smoking.

The review suggests that e-cigarettes may be contributing to falling smoking rates in the U.K., as 2.6 million adults are now thought to be using the product. 

They also found that almost all of these adults are ex-smokers, providing evidence that many people are not starting to use the devices after having never smoked in the first place, and instead are using them to either quit or cut down on tobacco.

“E-cigarettes are not completely risk free but when compared to smoking, evidence shows they carry just a fraction of the harm,” explained Professor Kevin Fenton, Director of Health and Wellbeing at PHE. “The problem is people increasingly think they are at least as harmful and this may be keeping millions of smokers from quitting. Local stop smoking services should look to support e-cigarette users in their journey to quitting completely.” 
  
The report also goes some way to dismiss the fears that e-cigarettes act as a route into smoking for young people and non-smokers. This reasoning is partly behind the Welsh government's recent move to ban e-cigarettes from all places in which smoking tobacco is also banned, arguing that they normalize the habit, and could encourage young people to take it up.

“Fears that e-cigarettes have made smoking seem normal again or even led to people taking up tobacco smoking are not so far being realised based on the evidence assessed by this important independent review,” said Professor Linda Bauld from Cancer Research UK. “In fact, the overall evidence points to e-cigarettes actually helping people to give up smoking tobacco.”

It’s estimated that currently 80,000 people in England die each year as a result of smoking, but if everybody who does smoke were to switch to e-cigarettes, then this figure is predicted to drop to just 4,000.

The evidence, according to the report, is clear: Smoking e-cigarettes is much less harmful than smoking tobacco cigarettes. And if used in conjunction with stop smoking support services, they offer a much better chance at quitting altogether. 

E-cigarettes do not burn anything, so they quite simply sidestep this serious health issue.

Another major benefit of smoking electronic cigarettes is the considerable financial savings that can be made. It can be up to 80% cheaper to use e-cigarettes versus traditional cigarette smoking. 

A word of caution

While every effort to help people stop smoking all together should remain a priority, many people either do not wish to stop smoking or (like me) find it very hard to do so. For this group, I believe that there is no better product that can deliver nicotine in such a safe way, without the harmful components like tar and the rest, found in tobacco.

Most of the diseases associated with smoking are caused by inhaling smoke which contains thousands of these toxic chemicals.

By contrast, nicotine is relatively safe. I've yet to hear of someone ‘overdosed’ on nicotine!
Or destroyed his own life or the lives of other's like in the case of alcohol abuse.

Therefore, e-cigarettes, which deliver nicotine without the harmful toxins found in tobacco smoke, are likely to be a safer alternative to smoking.

In addition, e-cigarettes reduce second hand smoke exposure since it does not produce actual smoke.
The wonderful thing about e-cigarettes is that you have complete control over the amount of nicotine that you use.

You can choose to reduce your nicotine intake by using ever weaker ‘e-liquid’. It's even possible to use e-liquid that has zero nicotine content, should you still struggle to break the physical habit completely.

It's important however to understand that electronic smoking can still be addictive if nicotine is used though.

Before changing to electronic cigarettes I would still recommend however that you contact your GP/Doctor for advice.

6. Note

I want to reiterate, I am no doctor or any kind of expert on these matters, but I am merely sharing with you my personal experience over the last few months.

I've been smoking for 49 years and during this period I only stopped on two occasions. Once for a week and once for three weeks.

I've switched to smoking an electronic cigarette and for the last eight months, I haven't touched a cigarette!

So if I can do it, so can everybody else. 

And the irony is, I'm still smoking..........




Tuesday, 21 October 2014

Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself - Who is my Neighbor and How must I Love him/her




"Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself"  
Who is my Neighbor and How must I Love him/her


Stes de Necker

Introduction

In Matt. 22: 39 Jesus commanded us: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself"

In the English and Hebrew Bibles, the word "neighbor" is used, while in other Bibles the word ‘nearest’ is used like in the Afrikaans Bible.  

The question is so often asked: "So who is my neighbor?" or, “Does it refer to the person or persons living in the house next to me?”

The Hebrew word for "neighbor", as used in the Torah is "rei-acha" meaning the Jews' immediate families or fellow Jews. The word "rei-acha" include concepts such as "your children" or "your brothers”.   

The Hebrew word for the person living next to you and what we would normally refer to as neighbor is "shachen", while the word used for husband or wife (spouse) is "rei-ah".

The correct Hebrew translation of the word "neighbor" is "rei-acha" which consequently means only the Jew’s immediate family.

Meaning of the word "neighbor"

If it was not for the Old Testament, we would have had a serious problem, because then it would have meant that only Jews were commanded to love one another!

But fortunately we find the rest of the meaning of the word neighbor in Lev. 19: 33: “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him."  And then continues in verse 34: “But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God." 

It follows therefore that the Lord Jesus' reference to "thy neighbor" in the New Testament (Matthew. 22: 39), refers to all people living in any community, Christians as well as non-Christians.

Meaning of the word love in the Bible

The next question so many people ask is: "What does it mean when the Bible says we must ‘love’ our neighbor?"

The biblical meaning of the word "love" does not mean we should walk arms around everyone we meet!       

In the Old Testament text of Leviticus, the Hebrew word "ahava" or "Ahab" is used. In Hebrew, there is another word for the concept of love and that is "hesed". The word hesed presupposes a hierarchical structure where someone on a higher level of the hierarchy, "hesed" (love) a person further down the hierarchy. It refers to God's love for man, and therefore man's love for his fellow man and his children. The word "hesed" do not refers to a child's love for his parents, or one's love for God.

The word "ahava" or "Ahab" is therefore the only Hebrew word for the concept of love as we would normally understand the term ‘love’. In the Hebrew style, the word ahava actually have two meanings, namely (a) I do, and (b) love. In Lev. 19:18 in the Hebrew Bible, the word "ve-a- hav-ta” which actually means “you have to give love ":
            לא תקם ולא תטר את בני עמך ואהבת לרעך כמוך אני יהוה: Lev. 19:18

Throughout the Hebrew translation of the New Testament, the word "ahava" is used for the concept of love in general. So for example. We read in Matt. 22: 39:
                            לא תקם ולא תטר את בני עמך ואהבת לרעך כמוך אני יהוה
“And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.”

In both the Old and the New Testament, the word "ahava" or "Ahab" (ואהבת) is used when the Bible speaks of love.

When we look in the Greek translation of the Bible (Septuagint) at the New Testament text from Matthew, we see that the Greek word "agape" is used in Matt. 22: 39.  
In Greek there are four different words that describe love, namely:
• agape
• Eros
• Philia
• Storge

The word agape (agape ἀγάπη) means unconditional, sacrificial, compassionate love. In the Greek translation of 1 Cor. 13, as in the rest of the New Testament, the word agape is constantly used to describe the meaning of love.    

The word s'agapo (Σ'αγαπώ) that "I love you" does not refer to the love between husband and wife or between a boyfriend and girlfriend. This kind of love is referred to as Eros, that intimate, passionate (including sexual) love. Hence the word ‘erotic’.

The remaining two words Philia and Storge refers to the emotional love, for instance, between brother and sister or the love that exist between close friends (Philia), or the affection we will have for a pet or a motorcar (Storge).  

When Paul, in Rom. 12: 10 says "kindl brotherly love for one another", he refers to ‘Phileo’ (verb of Philia) and when Jesus instructs us to love our neighbor as ourselves, Jesus uses the word ‘Agape’.

So what does Jesus command ‘to love thy neighbor as thyself’ means for us Christians today?

From all the different meanings of the term "love your neighbor", English, Hebrew and Greek, there is only one meaning for the word ‘love’ as it is meant in the Bible, and that is the unconditional love that asks nothing in exchange.

But we also know that for us, sinful and wayward creatures, it is difficult, if not downright impossible, to give such love. Even within marriage, ‘Agape’ love is not always possible. “I love you, but you must love me.”

Jesus instructs us in Luke. 6: 27-31 (27) "You must love your enemies; do good to those who hate you; (28) bless those who curse you; pray for those who mistreat you; (29) If someone strikes you on one cheek, offer him the other one; If someone takes your outerwear, also offer him your underwear; (30) To everyone who asks something, you must give; if someone takes your stuff you should not claim it back; (31) Treat others as you yourself want to be treated"

This certainly sounds as if our Savior is expecting too much of us!

But isn’t that exactly how we love ourselves? We are often our own worst enemy; sometimes we hate ourselves; sometimes we curse ourselves; we blame ourselves; we torment ourselves; we treat ourselves badly; we want to be treated like we think we should be treated! Despite all these emotions, we still love ourselves.

So when Jesus tells us we must love our neighbors as ourselves, that is exactly what he meant, "as we love ourselves", because that's how He loves us.

In John. 15: 9 Jesus said "As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. You must remain in My love. "And further in verse 10:" If you obey my commands, you will remain in My love, just as I have obeyed my Father's commands and remain in his love. "

John 15: 12 "This is My commandment, that you love one another as I love you."

Unconditional agape (love) is only in and through Jesus Christ possible; In ourselves we can never have that love.   

In the world that we live in where we hear every day of the atrocities and murder that is going on in the Middle East and where there are currently 45 wars going on around the world, one wonders involuntarily if the loved ones and families that are affected and left behind by these conflicts, can really follow Jesus' command that we should love our enemies (Matthew. 6: 44).

Can Christians really, in such circumstances, still forgive and forget and love each other?

It is within this context that Jesus tells us in John. 15: 16 says "So Father will give you whatever you ask in my name."

Forgiveness and love is and always will remain possible if we seek it, not within ourselves, but in the power and grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. Humanly it is not possible.

So we find these almost incomprehensible paradoxes in the Bible that -

We must ask God for the faith that we must have to believe in Him;
We must ask God for the love we must have to love Him;
We must ask God for the faith (hope) that we need to trust him;
We must ask God for the love for our neighbors so we may love them as we love ourselves.  

So whenever we have doubt if we will ever be able to meet the requirements to comply with God's will, then we have this wonderful consolation:


"As the Father will give you whatever you ask in My name."



Saturday, 20 September 2014

SOUTH AFRICA - TWENTY YEARS LATER




SOUTH AFRICA

TWENTY YEARS LATER


Stes de Necker


When the people of South Africa met on the 25th and 26th June 1955 in Kliptown near Johannesburg, the Congress of the People was convened and this meeting represented a historical moment in the establishment of a new order in South Africa, based on freedom, democracy and the will of the people. It brought together 2,844 delegates from all over the country. At this meeting, ‘The Freedom Charter’ (for a democratic South Africa), which embodied the hopes and aspirations of the majority of the people of South Africa, was adopted. The Charter proclaimed that ''South Africa belongs to all who live in it" and that "all shall be equal before the law" and It pledged to continue the struggle until a new democratic order was put into place.

The new order became reality when the ANC win the election in 1994 and took over the government of South Africa.

2014 marks the 20th anniversary of the ANC ruled Government and the question can be asked, and rightfully so, ‘What became of the noble aspirations adopted by the people of South Africa in 1995?’

During the past two decades, many foreign visitors who visited South Africa before are currently avoiding coming to South Africa; Several foreign investors who a decade ago was excited to invest in South Africa, are now taking their investments elsewhere; peaceful marches and protests turn violent in the space of minutes and normally lead to bloodshed and mayhem.

In the 20 years since the end of white minority rule, South Africa has rarely looked so unattractive.

Mining and Agriculture are in crisis as costs rise and commodity prices fail to cover the costs of production. Strikes and demonstrations are spreading across the mining industry and into other sectors.

Companies are losing production, and the recognized unions, with which business was able to barter in the past, have lost influence over the labour force.

Equally worrying is the political atmosphere which is not only highly charged but becoming increasingly poisonous. Opportunists such as Julius Malema, the disgraced former youth leader of the African National Congress, is now sitting in Parliament where he is not only busy exploiting the leadership vacuum, but is making a mockery of the proud South African Parliamentary tradition.

Black Economic Empowerment, affirmative action, nationalization and land reform, are still the greatest evils of the ANC culture and are effectively being manipulated by the Malema’s sitting in Parliament to further their own political aspirations and ideals.

South Africa is fast becoming a comedian's paradise. One after the other comic error is denting South Africa’s image locally and abroad.

The Nkandla debacle, the Malema circus, the bumbling Land Audit conducted by the Department of Land Affairs, a prejudiced Justice system and fraud and corruption uncovered almost daily in just about every State Department, are all fuelling the negative sentiments towards South Africa all over the world.

Remarkably, South Africa in terms of income distribution and wealth, has become even more unequal since 1994. What is needed to address this problem is much more than a debate about land tenure.

A culture of self-enrichment of the privileged loyalists in the ANC has taken root in all levels of Government. It is a culture of, ‘get as rich as possible, as soon as possible.’  It is a culture that embraces a variety of ills, most of which are aimed at the erosion of our constitutional democracy and the maintenance of the unscrupulous and incompetent politicians in their panelled offices and luxurious limousines.

The government's controversial tender system provides the opportunity for every friend and family member of the ruling elite to secure lucrative contracts, the vast majority of which are never implemented, or alternatively it is so half executed that the work or service have to redone in any case.  

And for those who do not have nepotistic connections with the ruling elite, there is always the possibility of a lucrative position somewhere in the deployment of some ANC's cadre.
 
Corruption in all facets and levels of Government has certainly the best income to risk ratio anywhere in the world, as less than 5% of all corruption charges are successfully prosecuted in our courts.

The immediate conundrum is not an easy one. Miners are already South Africa’s best-paid workers, but by comparison with the ruling black elite they are paupers. It may be possible for the government and industry to win some breathing space again by buying them, and workers in other industries, off. But this will only be a short term solution (and a small part at that) of the real problem. Further wage increases seems inevitable which will only mean that the mining industry will be become smaller and less competitive as a result.

Radical reforms to education, the labour market, business regulation and land ownership are needed to spur labour intensive sectors such as mining, manufacturing and agriculture.

Violence and the daily dose of comic errors by the political leadership are however symbolic of a bigger and deeper malaise. South Africa's problems are bigger than most South Africans think and as long as the group of privileged political elite remain in power, the more unlikely it will be that any significant improvement in the prevailing conditions will occur.

A complete restructuring of the whole socio-economic and socio-political environment is today certainly the biggest and most important challenge facing this country. 
 
South Africa’s economy has grown on average by 3.6 per cent over the past two decades. This pace of growth falls far short of what is needed to absorb the legions of currently unemployed people in South Africa.  

The necessary reforms will be painful, but deferring them will be even more painful. Far too long the ANC led Government, has deferred these tough decisions.

To quote the National Chairman of the Australian Protectionist Party, Andrew Phillips: “Despite noble announcements by the African National Congress (ANC) of its intent to make South Africa an egalitarian society in which all people could live in harmony and have equal opportunity, the reality is quite different. ... It is becoming increasingly clear the situation in South Africa warrants international attention once again"

The Western world was quick to take the moral high-ground against South Africa decades ago. Now is the time to expose their hypocrisy by refusing to exercise pressure and apply meaningful diplomatic pressure upon the ANC regime to bring about the long overdue changes so desperately needed in this country.  

South Africa’s Constitution is recognized throughout the world as one of the best constitutions in the world. Everybody involved was pleased and proud to have been a part of it. Two of our leaders were even awarded Nobel Peace Prizes.

But now it seems that most of our ANC leaders are uncomfortable with the Freedom Charter and the Constitution. They claim to live by the rule of law, but when the law isn’t on their side, they’re happy to bend, ignore, or even break it.

The ANC still claims that they want to reduce crime and corruption. That they want to improve the education and health systems. That they want to reduce unemployment and to provide homes for the homeless. But very little gets done about it!

In a previous article, “Suid-Afrika se krag in diversiteit”, I said that the only recipe for peace, prosperity and progress in this country, is the speedy return to the aspirations of the Freedom Charter and the adherence to the provisions of the Constitution. 

Its time that all South Africans once again unite around the noble ideals of the Freedom Charter.


The biggest evil in South Africa is that it is largely being driven by ignorance, bigotry and racism, instead of a mature, equitable vision for development and growth.


Friday, 19 September 2014

Life's a journey. Enjoy the ride - there is no return ticket.




Life's a journey  -  Enjoy the ride.

There is no return ticket  

Stes de Necker



Do you realize that the only time in our lives when we like to get old is when we're kids? 

If you're less than 10 years old, you're so excited about aging that you think in fractions. 'How old are you?' ' I'm four and a half!' You're never thirty-six and a half. You're four and a half, going on five! That's the key.

You get into your teens, now they can't hold you back. You jump to the next number, or even a few ahead. 'How old are you?' 'I'm gonna be 16!' You could be 13, but hey, you're gonna be 16! 

And then the greatest day of your life! You become 21. Even the words sound like a ceremony. YOU BECOME 21. YESSSS!

But then you turn 30.  Oooohh, what happened there? Makes you sound like bad milk! He TURNED; we had to throw him out. There's no fun now, you're just a sour-dumpling. What's wrong? What's changed? You BECOME 21, you TURN 30, then you're PUSHING 40. Whoa! 

Put on the brakes, it's all slipping away. Before you know it, you REACH 50, and your dreams are gone....

But! wait! You MAKE it to 60. You didn't think you would! So you BECOME 21, TURN 30, PUSHING 40, REACH 50, and MAKE it to 60.

You've built up so much speed that you HIT 70! After that, it's a day-by-day thing; you HIT Wednesday!

You get into your 80's, and every day is a complete cycle; you HIT lunch; you TURN 4:30; you REACH bedtime. And it doesn't end there. Into the 90s, you start going backwards; 'I Was JUST   92.'

Then a strange thing happens.. If you make it over 100, you become a little kid again. 'I'm 100 and a half!'

May you all make it to a healthy 100 and a half!!

HOW TO STAY YOUNG 
 
1. Throw out nonessential numbers. This includes age, weight and height. Let the doctors worry about them. That is why you pay them.


2. Keep only cheerful friends. The grouches pull you down.

3. Keep learning. Learn more about the computer, crafts, gardening, whatever, even ham radio. Never let the brain idle. 'An idle mind is the devil's workshop.' And the devil's family name is   Alzheimer's.

4. Enjoy the simple things.  

5. Laugh often, long and loud. Laugh until you gasp for breath.

6. The tears happen. Endure, grieve, and move on. The only person, who is with us our entire life, is ourselves Be ALIVE while you are alive.

7. Surround yourself with what you love   , whether it's family, pets, keepsakes, music, plants, hobbies, whatever. Your home is your refuge.

8. Cherish your health: If it is good, preserve it. If it is unstable, improve it. If it is beyond what you can improve, get help.

9. Don't take guilt trips. Take a trip to the mall, even to the next county; to a foreign country, but NOT to where the guilt is.

10. Tell the people you love that you love them, at every opportunity. 

AND, ALWAYS REMEMBER:
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally used up and worn out, shouting
'FUCK ... what a ride!'


Refugees - the Casualties of Conflict




Refugees - the Casualties of Conflict


Stes de Necker


Today the world is still criticizing Germany for what Hitler did to 6 million Jews, 70 years ago, but remain silent about all the Treblinka's, Dachau's, Buchenwald', Auschwitz's, Birkenau' and Ravensbruck's we see in the world today.

The total number of people forcibly displaced worldwide has reached 45.2m people, the highest level in almost 20 years, according to a report published today by the UN's High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

The annual 'Global Trends' report shows that as of the end of 2012, more than 45.2m people were forcibly displaced compared with 42.5m at the end of 2011

Around 35.8m persons were of concern to the UNHCR by end 2012, the second highest number on record, according to their latest report. The highest figure since 1993, when recording keeping began, was in 2009 with 36.5m persons of concern.

According to the UNHCR report, the conflict in Syria has forced 647,000 people to flee mainly to neighbouring countries. This was the largest annual exodus by a single refugee group since 1999, when more than 867,000 people fled Kosovo.

Afghanistan continues to be the main source country of refugees with 2.6m by the end of 2012. 

Whilst Pakistan is host to 1.6m refugees, the largest number worldwide, Iran has the second largest number of refugees with 868,200.

The UNHCR state that in the last year, 23,000 people per day were forced to leave their homes due to conflict and persecution. Developing countries host more than 80% of the world's refugees

In 700 refugee camps currently spread all over the world, the same tragedies that were prevalent in the camps of Germany and all other POW Camps worldwide, are playing itself out each and every day, while the world looks on. In most instances, ‘passive murder and elimination’ have replaced the active murders which took place in the German and other camps 70 years ago.

Most of these refugees’ lives disappeared before them in the blink of an eye.

War, violence or fear for their family’s safety force them to flee their homes.

And after finding shelter far from their families and loved ones, they were forced to become dependent on handouts of food; possibly have no clean drinking water and no access to health care.  

It is in such desolate and precarious conditions that millions of people around the world, including the inhabitants of Camp Liberty and Camp Ashraf, must survive every day.


Thursday, 18 September 2014

US PRIORITIES IN DISARRAY




US PRIORITIES IN DISARRAY

Stes de Necker



US House of Representatives Approves Resolution to Fund and Equip Syrian Rebels
MOSCOW, September 18 (RIA Novosti)

The United States House of Representatives passed a resolution authorizing $500 million to go to training and equipping moderate Syrian rebels to fight against Islamic State (IS) in the Middle East.The resolution passed Wednesday in a vote of 273-156.

The Islamic State, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), is a Sunni jihadist group that has been fighting the Syrian government since 2012, expanding its attacks to northern and western regions of Iraq in June 2014.

It is a fact that the Syrian situation is certainly critical, but how the US determines their priorities remains a mystery.

The Islamic State, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), is a Sunni jihadist group that has been fighting the Syrian government since 2012, expanding its attacks to northern and western regions of Iraq in June 2014. The militants have seized vast areas in both countries and proclaimed an Islamic caliphate on all the territories under their control.

On the other hand there is the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK).

Prior to the 2003 U.S.-led war in Iraq, the PMOI publicly declared its neutrality and played no part in the conflict. In the early part of the invasion, as a result of quid pro quo between Washington and Tehran, PMOI bases were repeatedly bombed by Coalition forces, inflicting dozens of casualties and enormous structural damage.

In April 2003, US forces signed a cease-fire agreement of "mutual understanding and coordination" with the PMOI. Finally in May 2003, as a result of negotiations between the PMOI and US forces led by General Ray Odierno, the PMOI agreed to a "voluntary consolidation" and disarming of its forces in exchange for US protection of Camp Ashraf and its residents.

After an extensive 16-month investigation of every member of the PMOI in Camp Ashraf by seven different US government agencies that began after the US agreement, PMOI members were found not to have violated any US law [New York Times, July 27, 2004]. In addition, the US Government declared them to have been "non-combatants" during the 2003 war.

In 2004 the US led Multi-National Force - Iraq (MNF-I) formally recognized all the residents of Camp Ashraf (which were later moved to Camp Liberty near Baghdad) as "Protected Persons" under the Fourth Geneva Convention [Coalition Statement, July 2004], and U.S. forces took up their protection.

In January 2009, despite strong opposition by the residents and several legal opinions by distinguished jurists, the camp's security was transferred to Iraq without any credible guarantees.
Today these refugees must survive the most terrible living conditions in Camp Liberty.

Residents have no freedom of movement, and Iraq has banned them from having access to their relatives, human rights activists, parliamentarians, reporters and any foreign visitor in Liberty or Ashraf.

Heavy medical restrictions are imposed on the camp residents, and this has led to the death of two residents by the start of 2013. The ground is gravel, and there are no pavements. The GoI does not permit contractors into the camp to build stable ramp entries for the disabled.

Residents are not allowed to use machinery and the GoI prevents them from transferring their forklifts from Ashraf to move items and do construction work in Camp Liberty. The residents are therefore forced to carry heavy loads by hand leading to numerous injuries.

Iraq refuses to connect the camp to the national electricity grid, and the few power generators that are in the camp are dilapidated. By December 2012, Liberty residents had paid $3.5 million for fuel for generators at the camp to provide electricity and $2.5 million for a water supply project.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on 23 November 2012 described conditions at Camp Liberty as synonymous with that of a detention centre and in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This was the second opinion adopted by the Working Group detailing abuses at the camp. Another opinion issued on 17 July 2012 found similar abuses taking place.

In 2012 the residents signed a deal with a British company to sell their moveable and fixed property for approx. $525 million, but this deal was blocked by the GoI which is trying to steal and misappropriate all the property.

The question remains how the US determines their priorities.

Why does the US not comply with their contractual obligations towards the residents of Camp Liberty who are in dire need of help and how is it possible that the House of Representatives can approve $500 million funding to aid rebel forces in Syria, (with whom they have no contractual obligations), but not come to the rescue of 3000 Iranian dissidents who have always been loyal and supportive of US policy?


IT IS TIME FOR THE US TO GET THEIR PRIORITIES IN ORDER!


Monday, 15 September 2014

International Day of Democracy




International Day of Democracy
15 September 2014


Stes de Necker


Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 15, 2014

“There are few ideas more powerful – more infused with universal aspiration – than democracy.
The desire for democracy is shared by people the world over. The privilege to vote, the freedom to speak your mind, the right to a government by the people and for the people, these are ideas that continue to inspire – from the Egyptians who took to Tahrir Square, to democracy activists in Burma, to the brave Ukrainians who took to the ballot box earlier this year.

Today we recognize International Day of Democracy, a day set aside to a way of life that allows each and every citizen to participate in his or her government. This year’s theme – Engaging Young People on Democracy – powerfully underscores the importance of youth in building and preserving democracy.

Democratic societies are strong societies, because people are free to speak out against injustices and to discuss, debate, and work together to drive positive change – even with those who hold opposing views. In a democracy, we are free to choose our leaders, hold government institutions accountable, and work with those institutions to build a more stable and prosperous future for all members of our society.

As the United States works to strengthen our democracy at home, we will continue to support those around the world fighting for their voices to be heard.”

                                                                            ==========

 A few days ago I posted a comment on Facebook saying that democracy carries within itself the germ of its own destruction.

Today is International Day of Democracy and as much as I want to support and agree with Secretary Kerry, I regard it my duty to seriously warn all readers against Secretary Kerry’s unqualified statement that “In a democracy, we are free to choose our leaders, hold government institutions accountable, and work with those institutions to build a more stable and prosperous future for all members of our society.”

The previous Secretary General of the UN said that as long as societies shout and scream, leaders would tend to listen. But when society does not continuously scream and shout at their leaders, the leaders seem to get complacent and start doing what they want.

Today Iran and Iraq stand as grim reminders of so called Parliamentary Democracies gone terribly wrong.

Last night we learned that Brazil has now been taken over by a Communist Regime, only to read today (15/09/2014) that there are already some American politicians who are already concerned about the expansion of Communism so close to America.

Western Democracy, as we know it, is only as strong as the people living under it, are prepared to protect and safeguard their democratic rights and privileges.


A COMPLACENT DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IS A DYING SOCIETY.