CANCER - Eleven Facts on Cancer and Cancer Treatment you probably never heard of

CANCER

Eleven Facts on Cancer and Cancer Treatment you probably never heard of 

Stes de Necker

1.  The Real Cause of Cancer 

More than 85 years ago one of the most remarkable and renowned scientist, Otto Warburg, won 2 Nobel Prizes for determining the cause of cancer. He proved the cause was anaerobism, or a lack of oxygen in the cells. When he went to America to teach students at Berkeley University, he stated that there is no disease that we know more about the cause and the cure than cancer. He also said that due to the malicious nature of the American Medical Association (AMA) and the FDA, they will prevent people from knowing the truth and taking the nutrients they need which would in turn cause millions of people to die needlessly.

Since then more than 30 million Americans have died. Science had the cure 100 years ago, but the greed and corruption prevented these cures from reaching you and me.

Cancer occurs when there is a lack of oxygen in our cells which is caused by a polluted cellular environment, acidic foods (meat, alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, sugars etc.), polluted air, heavy metals in our environment and other factors; the biggest being our diet.

2. Monopoly On Your Health

The US Government has a law which states "Only drugs can cure, prevent, and treat disease." Currently, under U. S. Federal law, no natural substance can be advertised as a cure for any condition – period. Companies that get too successful with cancer treatment are shut down by FDA lawsuits that are supported directly by the pharmaceutical companies.

This means only the chemicals that come from the factories of pharmaceutical companies can treat you, nothing else.

Big Pharma has a monopoly on your health and they are not about to jeopardize their trillion dollar profits by teaching you inexpensive and powerful natural remedies. And if a doctor decides to treat their patients with a natural remedy, even if it's over 90% successful, that means he is breaking the law and his license will be suspended and he may even be sentenced to jail (which has happened numerous times to honest medical doctors).

Once in practice they have health agencies, insurance companies, and the government all looking over their shoulders, checking every examination and diagnosis, with attorneys ready to pounce on any mistake or slip.

With insurance companies and Medicare/Medicaid only paying a fraction of what the doctor bills them, they are under intense economic pressure to keep the face-to-face appointment as brief as possible.

Studies showed that on average patients spend about two minutes with the doctor during each visit.

Is it possible for them to question you, or figure out why you are sick? How can they in 2 minutes? All they really have time to do is write you a prescription slip.

Nobody wants to be sick, not you or your doctors. But sickness keeps Big Pharma alive. They make their profits on the sickness of others. Be it a pill for a headache or acne, an injection vaccine, Big Pharma not only needs you to want their drugs, they need you to NEED them. They can only increase their profits through disease-mongering; creating new diseases, inciting fear of them, and then telling you they have the only solution through direct advertising.

And it works like a charm.

3. How does this happen?

Throughout the 20th century, the pharmaceutical industry has been constructed by investors, the goal being to replace effective but non-patentable natural remedies with mostly ineffective but patentable and highly profitable pharmaceutical drugs. 

The very nature of the pharmaceutical industry is to make money from ongoing diseases.

Like other industries, the pharmaceutical industry tries to expand their market - that is to maintain ongoing diseases and to find new diseases for their drugs. Prevention and cure of diseases damages the pharmaceutical business and the eradication of common diseases threatens its very existence.

Therefore, the pharmaceutical industry fights the eradication of any disease at all costs.

The pharmaceutical industry itself is the main obstacle, why today's most widespread diseases are further expanding including heart attacks, strokes, cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes, osteoporosis, and many others. Pharmaceutical drugs are not intended to cure diseases.

According to health insurers, over 24,000 pharmaceutical drugs are currently marketed and prescribed without any proven therapeutic value (AOK Magazine 4/98).

According to medical doctors associations, the known dangerous side-effects of pharmaceutical drugs have become the fourth leading cause of death after heart attacks, cancer and strokes (Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA April 15, 1998)

Millions of people and patients around the world are defrauded twice: A major portion of their income is used up to finance the exploding profits of the pharmaceutical industry. In return, they are offered a medicine that does not even cure.

4. We are not dealing with a scientific problem.  We are dealing with a commercial issue

Every discoverer of a cancer remedy has encountered a Chinese wall of resistance, which has been the same in every page of recorded cancer history, and that the myth that the discoverer of a cancer cure would be "honored, acclaimed, and practically deified as a saviour of the human race, should be changed to "dishonored, denounced and crucified.

If this information would be made freely available tomorrow to mainstream news, that would mean the end of the billion dollar drug industry, it would be wiped out overnight; huge institutes, million dollar research labs, universities, grants, journals, professors, experts, and cushy multi million dollar jobs would be erased within a day, and not to mention the fact that someone would have to answer for the hundreds of thousands of dead people who didn't have to die, and the fact that what they were doing was not only wrong, but they kept lying to keep this failing system alive even with overwhelming scientific evidence going against them.

This is something big pharma will fight to protect until the very end.

Believe it or not, there are many natural cures for cancer. As the legendary Robert Atkins, M.D., once remarked:
“Consider this. You are worth anywhere from $300,000 to $1,000,000 to Big Pharma from your cancer treatments. And the racketeers who rake in this money couldn’t care less whether you live or die.

A chemo drug called Erlotinib costs $3,500 a month. The FDA approved it as a treatment for cancer because it supposedly improved survival by 12 days! Another chemo drug that costs $10,000 a month improved survival by six weeks. Six weeks of hell, I might add. Chemo makes you feel like hell and look like hell.

There’s big money at stake in keeping this drug racket going. The profits of the 10 drug companies in the Fortune 500 exceed the profits of the other 490 companies put together! These profits are simply mind-boggling. The drug profiteers are making money hand over fist by poisoning cancer patient

The truth is they have been systematically destroying and suppressing any and all natural remedies since the early 1900's!

We know that conventional therapy doesn't work—if it did you would not fear cancer any more than you fear pneumonia. It is the utter lack of certainty as to the outcome of conventional treatment that virtually screams for more freedom of choice in the area of cancer therapy.

Yet most so-called alternative therapies regardless of potential or proven benefit, are outlawed, which forces patients to submit to the failures we know don't work, because there is no other choice.

Most patients in the US die of chemotherapy.   Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancer.   This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors.

Except for two forms of cancer, chemotherapy does not cure.  There is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about chemotherapy, that somehow there is a correlation between shrinking a tumor and extending the life of the patient. 

Chemotherapy and radiation can increase the risk of developing a second cancer by up to 100 times.

In most cases, when people die from cancer, they are NOT actually dying from cancer, but instead, they are dying from the medical TREATMENT itself. They are dying from the chemotherapy, radiation and surgery.

Clearly, conventional cancer treatments have an important place in medicine and save lives. But since the 1950s, evidence has steadily accumulated that surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are far less effective than the public is being led to believe.

A study of over 10,000 patients clearly shows that chemo’s supposedly strong track record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients who underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukaemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who did not undergo chemotherapy (NCI Journal 87:10).

Children who are successfully treated for Hodgkin's disease are 18 times more likely later to develop secondary malignant tumors. Girls face a 35 per cent chance of developing breast cancer by the time they are 40, which is 75 times greater than the average.

The risk of leukaemia increased markedly four years after the ending of successful treatment, and reached a plateau after 14 years, but the risk of developing solid tumors remained high and approached 30 per cent at 30 years (New Eng J Med, March 21, 1996)

5. While In Office, President Ronald Reagan Cured His Cancer Naturally

When President Ronald Reagan got cancer during his presidency, the great German doctor Hans Nieper, M.D, treated him with natural remedies which will be discussed shortly. It would have been front page news if it hadn't been hushed up at the time. That’s why the method he used was hushed and suppressed by the pharmaceutical industry.

Just imagine if the American public knew a sitting president preferred German cancer treatments!

Many American cancer patients lose their hair, their dignity and their lives for traditional barbaric treatments. But the president of the United States was treated with natural remedies and lived until the lively age of 93, but he certainly didn't die of cancer.

Why is the president allowed to know the truth, but you don’t?

Because if the news of his astounding recovery and perfect health due to natural treatments would have collapsed the pharmaceutical industry overnight.

6. CANCER COVER-UP No. 1

The FTC Launches a Covert Campaign to Censor Natural Cancer Remedies and Financially Ruin Doctors and Companies Offering Them.

Sad as it seems, the harassment of doctors using natural therapies to treat cancers has been going on for more than 50 years in America. Doctors treating malignant tumors with detoxification, immune stimulation, nutrient, herb and juice fasting secrets from Europe, Tibet, China and India have been persecuted and booted out of the U.S. if they wanted to continue treating cancer patients.

Take the case of William Kelly, DDS. Dr. Kelly discovered a natural enzyme therapy that, combined with strict nutrition and a detoxification regime, "digested" pancreatic cancer cells. This therapy achieved nearly a 90 percent, five-year survival rate for close to 33,000 patients-even though pancreatic cancer is by far the most rapid and deadly cancer.

What did the government do when they heard about Dr. Kelly's amazing discovery? They threw him in jail!

Now, the government is bringing out the Big Guns! The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently launched what they call "Operation False Cures" to stamp out natural cancer cures for good.

Here's what Dr. Hollohan, former chief of the Fraud Division of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said about the public's ability to make sound choices regarding medical care: "For the majority of alternative therapies being offered today, there is virtually no scientific evidence that one can expect to benefit from any of them. The public in general doesn't have the knowledge to make an informed choice." What Arrogance!

According to the FTC, "Anyone mentioning a cure for cancer is automatically a quack, regardless of science backing their position." By their own admission, they state that any mention of a cancer "cure" is by itself fraudulent. And anyone using the word "cure" on a website to promote a product is instantly presumed to be guilty of criminal acts.

7. CANCER COVER-UP No. 2  

Drug Companies Pay Oncologists Big "Kickbacks" to Promote High-Priced, but Ineffective Cancer Drugs.

Do you know how most oncologists make money? Not by treating patients, but by selling cancer drugs.

According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, as much as 75 percent of the average oncologists' earnings come from selling chemotherapy drugs in his or her office. And at a substantial mark-up!

The U.S. drug industry spent over$33.5 billion in promotion costs last year.

A former drug rep from Eli Lily testified before Congress saying, "Pharmaceutical companies hire former cheerleaders and ex-models to wine and dine doctors, exaggerate drug benefits and underplay side effects."

An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that the average oncologist makes $253,000 per year. Incredible as it sounds, the article says that 75 percent of those earnings — about $190,000 — come from chemotherapy drug profits! 

If you subtract those drug profits, the oncologist would make little more than $60,000 per year.

They get paid to kill people!

Worse, they pay oncologists kickbacks to push their drugs. For example, AstraZeneca, Inc. had to pay $280 million in civil penalties and $63 million in criminal penalties to the federal government because it paid kickbacks to doctors for promoting its prostate cancer drug.

8. WHAT IS CHEMOTHERAPY  

Chemotherapy is a derivative of mustard gas, the toxin that was used by the United States Army to kill enemy forces in World War I, and was eventually outlawed by the Geneva Convention.

In the 1930's Memorial Sloan-Kettering began testing these mustard gas derivatives to treat cancer. 

They had 0 percent success rates. In the 1940's more testing was conducted at Yale; out of 160 patient treated nobody was cured.

During the first trials to find the perfect drug, some 400,000 "cytotoxins" were tested by Sloan-Kettering and the NCI (National Cancer Institute). Their only criterion for testing was; which toxic compound will kill some of the cancer cells before it kills the patient.

Thousands of the compounds tested were simply refined poisons. After their trials about 50 toxins were chosen and are still the basis of today's chemotherapy 'treatments'.

Despite absolutely no positive results, not one person cured, not a shred of proof these toxins had any benefit whatsoever to a cancer patient, these drugs gained popularity over the decades and are still in use today.

About 27% of people that get diagnosed with cancer and don’t do anything, heal spontaneously! 

That's the statistics from many doctors; a quarter of people that do absolutely nothing, no chemo, no radiation, no orthodox or even alternative methods cure themselves of cancer.

So with the current modern medical 2% cure rate, chemo and radiation is killing off the 25% of people that would have otherwise survived by doing absolutely nothing.

In 1994 the British Journal of Cancer showed double the survival rates for cancer patients using a placebo instead of Levamisole, a popular chemotherapy drug (was previously used as a de-worming agents for sheep, and sold for $1 a month, and as soon as it was labelled as a "cancer drug" it is sold for over $1000 a treatment, mind you its the same compound and nothing was done to change it).

Modern medicine itself states that any drug that has an effectiveness rate of less than 30% is considered no better than a placebo, or as they call it: a sugar pill. A cure rate of 2% is so abysmally low in the medical world, it is astounding they still even consider calling chemo and radiation worthy treatments.

If you start chemo, you have an added 2% survival rate. If you don't do anything at all, you have a 25% chance of surviving, but if you start utilizing some simple, natural cures currently used today around the world, you have a 70-95% chance of survival. So which treatment would you prefer?

If modern medical treatments actually worked, you would see a decline in cancer, NOT an INCREASE!

If chemotherapy, drugs, or radiation worked, cancer would be cured and wiped out. Yet the rates of this disease keep rising every single year. 

1900 – 3%

1950 – 20%

1972 – 27%

1999 – 39%

By 2020 – It is estimated that 50% of the population will have cancer.

In the past 100 years, there has never been a year when cancer rates have decreased. Every single year, like clockwork, cancer rates are rising exponentially. What about our "state-of-the-art" cancer treatments? They should be working, but the statistics show the contrary.

Traditional treatments have failed.

The New England Journal of Medicine Reports— War on Cancer Is a Failure: Despite $30 billion spent on research and treatments since 1970, cancer remains "undefeated," with a death rate not lower, but 6% higher in 1997 than 1970, stated John C. Bailar III, M.D., Ph.D., and Heather L. Gornik, M.H.S., both of the Department of Health Studies at the University of Chicago in Illinois.

9. CANCER COVER-UP No. 3

Big Pharma Resorts to Outrageous Lies to Convince You That Their So-Called Cancer "Cures" Work.  

For instance, if you or a loved one has breast cancer, doctors may recommend the drug Tamoxifen. 

You'll likely hear that it reduces the chances of breast cancer recurring by 49 percent.

But the truth is, based on absolute numbers, Tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast cancer returning by 1.6 percent-30 times less than advertised.

"Relative" numbers are used because they can be manipulated in many ways. Relative to what? It could be to a previous test or some other obscure number.

10. CANCER COVER-UP No. 4

Mammograms Do More Damage Than Good-and Actually HARM Ten Women for Every One It Helps

The $4 billion-a-year mammogram industry urges women to rely on x-ray tests to protect their health. 

But what they don't tell you is mammograms are really an unnecessary and even harmful treatment.

Terrified of Developing Breast of Prostate Cancer?

A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Center in Demark reviewed the benefits and negative effects of seven breast cancer screening programs on 500,000 women-and the results were shocking.

For every 2,000 women who received mammograms over a 10-year period, only one would have her life prolonged, but ten would be harmed. Mammograms can actually increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer by as much as 3 percent per year by irradiating the breast cells and triggering breast cancer.

And that’s while there is a new test for breast cancer with no false negatives or positives... from urine.

That's right. Researchers discovered that people with cancer carry different proteins then people with no cancer-and this can be tested by a simple test. So simple you can do it right at home.

11. CANCER COVER-UP No. 5 

1 Percent of Oncologists Would REFUSE Chemotherapy If They Had Cancer.

Why? Because they know it's extremely ineffective and extremely toxic.

The true 5-year cure rate of conventional cancer treatments is less than 3% (actually, about 2.1%). 

This statistic is from the Journal of Oncology in 2004. Their "cure rate" hasn't changed much, if any, since 2004. They hide their true cure rate by using clever terminology, such as by using the term "response," which means nothing as far as survival is concerned.

Research has shown that 3 of every 4 doctors and scientists would refuse chemotherapy for themselves due to its devastating effects body and immune system, and because of its extremely low success rate. On top of that, only 2 to 4% of all cancers even respond to chemotherapy or prove to be "life extending," yet it is prescribed across the board for just about every kind of cancer.

The McGill Cancer Center in Montreal, Quebec, one of the largest and most prestigious cancer treatment centers in the world, did a study of oncologists to determine how they would respond to a diagnosis of cancer. 

On the confidential questionnaire, 91% said that ALL chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members. The overriding reasons they gave for this decision were that the drugs are ineffective and have an unacceptable degree of toxicity. 

These are the same doctors who will tell you that their chemotherapy treatments will shrink your tumor and prolong your life.