Origin and Migration of the Indigenous Peoples of Africa
Stes de Necker
In paleoantropologie,
the recent “(Recent)
Out-of-Africa” model is the mainstream model describing the origin and early dispersal of anatomically
modern humans. The theory is called the (Recent) Out-of-Africa
model in the popular press, and academically the recent single-origin
hypothesis (RSOH), Replacement Hypothesis, and Recent
African Origin (RAO) model. The hypothesis that humans have a single
origin (monogenesis) was published in Charles Darwin's Descent of Man
(1871). The concept was speculative until the 1980s, when it was corroborated
by a study of present-day mitochondrial DNA,
combined with evidence based on physical anthropology of archaic specimens.
According to genetic and fossil evidence, archaic Homo sapiens evolved to anatomically
modern humans solely in Africa,
between 200,000 and 150,000 years ago.
Members of one branch left Africa
by between 125,000 and 60,000 years ago and over time replaced earlier human
populations such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus. The date
of this original "out of Africa" migration has mostly been dated to
between 70,000 and 60,000 years ago, but a 2011 study suggested that an early
wave of migration may have taken place as early as 125,000 years ago.
The recent single origin of modern humans in East Africa is the
near-consensus position held within the scientific community.
However, recent sequencing of the full Neanderthal Genome suggests
Neanderthals and some modern humans share some ancient genetic lineages. The
authors of the study suggest that their findings are consistent with
Neanderthal admixture of up to 4% in some populations. But the study also
suggests that there may be other reasons why humans and Neanderthals share
ancient genetic lineages.
The competing hypothesis is the multiregional
origin of modern humans. Some push back the original "out of Africa " migration (in this case, by Homo
erectus, not by Homo sapiens) to two million years ago.
Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about
250,000 years ago. The trend in cranial expansion
and the acheulean elaboration of stone tool technologies
which occurred between 400,000 years ago and the second interglacial period in
the Middle Pleistocene
(around 250,000 years ago) provide evidence for a transition from H. erectus
to H. sapiens.
In the Recent African Origin (RAO) scenario, migration within and
out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier
dispersed H. erectus.
Exodus from Africa
Some 70,000 years ago, a number of these H. sapiens migrated from East Africa into the Near East. The date of
this first wave of "out of Africa" migration has been called into
question in 2011, based on the discovery of stone tools in the United Arab
Emirates, indicating the presence of modern humans between 100,000
and 125,000 years ago.
Some scientists believe that only a few people left Africa in a
single migration that went on to populate the rest of the world based on the
fact that only descents of these early H.
sapiens are found outside Africa . From
that settlement, some others point to the possibility of several waves of
expansion. For example, Wells says that the early travelers followed the southern
coastline of Asia, crossed about 250 kilometers [155 miles] of sea, and
colonized Australia
by around 50,000 years ago. The Aborigines of Australia, Wells says, are the
descendants of the first wave of migrations.
It has been estimated that from a population of 2,000 to 5,000
individuals in Africa, only a small group, possibly as few as 150 to 1,000
people, crossed the Red Sea into Saudi Arabia .
Of all the lineages present in Africa only the female descendants
of one lineage, mtDNA haplogroup, are found outside Africa . Had there been several migrations one would
expect descendants of more than one lineage to be found outside Africa . L3's female descendants, the M and N haplogroup
lineages, are found in very low frequencies in Africa (although haplogroup M1 is very ancient and diversified in
North
and Northeast Africa)
and appear to be recent arrivals. A possible explanation is that these
mutations occurred in East Africa shortly before the exodus and by the founder effect became the
dominant haplogroups after the exodus from Africa .
Alternatively, the mutations may have arisen shortly after the exodus from Africa .
Other scientists have proposed a Multiple Dispersal Model, in
which there were two migrations out of Africa, one across the Red Sea traveling
along the coastal regions to India (the Coastal Route), which would be represented by
Haplogroup M. Another group of migrants with Haplogroup N followed the Nile
from East Africa, heading northwards and crossing into Asia through the Sinai. This group then
branched in several directions, some moving into Europe and others heading east
into Asia . This hypothesis attempts to explain
why Haplogroup N is predominant in Europe and why Haplogroup M is absent in Europe . Evidence of the coastal migration is hypothesized
to have been destroyed by the rise in sea levels during the Holocene epoch.
Alternatively, a small European founder population, that initially
expressed both Haplogroup M and N, could have lost Haplogroup M through random
genetic drift resulting from a bottleneck (i.e. a founder effect).
Today at the Bab-el-Mandeb straits the Red Sea is about 12 miles
(20 kilometres) wide, but 50,000 years ago sea levels were 70 meters lower
(owing to glaciation) and the water was much narrower. Though the straits were
never completely closed, there may have been islands in between which could be
reached using simple rafts. Shell middens 125,000 years old have been found in Eritrea, indicating the
diet of early humans included seafood obtained by beachcombing.
Subsequent Expansion
Subsequent expansion From the Near East, these
populations spread east to South Asia by 50,000 years ago, and on to Australia by 40,000 years ago, Homo sapiens for
the first time colonizing territory never reached by Homo erectus. Europe was reached by Cro-Magnon some 40,000
years ago. East Asia (Korea, Japan) was reached by 30,000 years ago. It is
disputed whether subsequent migration to North America
took place around 30,000 years ago, or only considerably later, around 14,000
years ago.
The group that crossed the Red Sea traveled along the coastal
route around the coast of Arabia
and Persia
until reaching India ,
which appears to be the first major settling point. Haplogroup M is found in
high frequencies along the southern coastal regions of Pakistan and India and it
has the greatest diversity in India, indicating that it is here where the
mutation may have occurred. Sixty percent of the Indian population belong to Haplogroup M. The
indigenous people of the Andaman Islands
also belong to the M lineage. The Andamanese are thought to be offshoots of
some of the earliest inhabitants in Asia because of their long isolation from
mainland Asia .
They are evidence of the coastal route of early settlers that
extends from India along the
coasts of Thailand
and Indonesia all the way to
Papua New Guinea.
Since M is found in high frequencies in highlanders from New Guinea as well,
and both the Andamanese and New Guineans have dark skin and Afro-textured hair,
some scientists believe they are all part of the same wave of migrants who
departed across the Red Sea ~60,000 years ago in the Great Coastal Migration.
Notably, the findings of Harding et al. (2000, p. 1355) show
that, at least with regard to dark skin color,
the haplotype background of
Papua New Guineans is identical to that of Africans (barring a single silent
mutation).
Thus, although these groups are distinct from Africans at other
loci (due to drift, bottlenecks, etc), it is evident that selection for the
dark skin color
trait likely continued following the exodus. This would support the hypothesis
that suggests that the original migrants from Africa
resembled pre-exodus Africans (at least in skin color), and that the present
day remnants of this ancient phenotype can be seen among contemporary Africans,
Andamanese and New Guineans. Others suggest that their physical resemblance to
Africans could be the result of convergent
evolution.
From Arabia
to India the proportion of
haplogroup M increases eastwards: in eastern India , M outnumbers N by a ratio of
3:1. However, crossing over into East Asia ,
Haplogroup N reappears as the dominant lineage. M is predominant in South East Asia but amongst Indigenous Australians
N reemerges as the more common lineage. This discontinuous distribution of
Haplogroup N from Europe to Australia
can be explained by founder effects and population bottlenecks.
Source: Wikipedia - Recent African origin of modern humans
Migration
routes from Africa
Migration
of groups within South Africa .
No comments:
Post a Comment